<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>CLE-podcasts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com</link>
	<description>CLE Podcasts for California Attorneys.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.13" mode="advanced" entry="normal" -->
	<itunes:summary>CLE Podcasts for California Attorneys.</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>CLE Podcasts for California Attorneys.</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Episode 28 – Political Campaigns, combat helicopters and Batmobiles.</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#160; Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters A Canadian Lawyer&#8217;s perspectives MegaUpload Golan v. Holder  ruling Helicopters in video games&#8230; need a license? and more GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/e3fb5_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters</li>
<li>A Canadian Lawyer&#8217;s perspectives</li>
<li>MegaUpload</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder  ruling</li>
<li>Helicopters in video games&#8230; need a license?</li>
<li>and more</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em><span>for this episode.</span></p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/e3fb5_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<p><strong>  </strong></p>
<p><strong>Bob Tarantino<br />
</strong>Blog: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/<br />
email:  BTarantino@heenan.ca</p>
<div><a href="http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=1602"><img class="   " style="margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 25px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/3ae92_to_tarantino_b_72dpi_duotone.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="120" /></a>
<p>Bob Tarantino</p>
</div>
<p>Bob Tarantino is a partner in the Entertainment Law group at Heenan Blaikie LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between entertainment and intellectual property law. Bob has been recognized as one of Canada’s leading lawyers in the area of entertainment law in the 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in Canada (Woodward/White).  In 2010 he launched Heenan Blaikie&#8217;s Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal, a collaborative blog by members of the firm&#8217;s Entertainment Law group, which was recognized as a co-winner of the Best New Law Blog in the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<h3>NEWT GINGRICH CAMPAIGN’S MUSIC COPYRIGHT ISSUES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/newt-gingrich-eye-of-tiger-lawsuit-285913">Newt Gingrich’s campaign makes the news twice in a week for claims of copyright infringement of a song</a>.   Rude Music Inc., owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_the_Tiger"> song “Eye of the Tiger,”</a> filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal district court in Chicago for Gingrich’s use of the song on the campaign trail.</p>
</div>
<h4>CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW APPROACH TO SIMILAR SCENARIO</h4>
<p>The Newt Gingrich Campaign has been using the song, “How You Like Me Now” at campaign events. Third Side Music, a Montreal Record Label that controls the rights to the song sent Gingrich’s team a cease and desist order.</p>
<p>In the US, using a song at the public event requires securing a valid public performance license from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Beyond that, an artist does not have the ability to restrict the use of their song at a political event.</p>
<p>In Canada, the Canadian Copyright Act gives authors moral rights.</p>
<p>The author of a work has the right to the “integrity” of the work which is ingringed if the work is, to the “prejudice of the honor or reputation of the author, distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified; or used in association with a product, service, cause or institution (Section 14.1, Section 28.2).”</p>
<p>Thus, here, the use of the song in association with a cause (the campaign) prejudices the honor or reputation of the author and infringes his moral rights.</p>
<p>Third Side Music is the Canadian music publisher that controls the rights to the song.<br />
Bob’s blog post at Entertainment Media Signal: <a href="http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter">http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter</a></p>
<h3>MITT ROMNEY/NBC</h3>
<p>NBC’s lawyers have asked Romney to take out any reference to the network’s journalism in any other ads as well, but the campaign said it believes it falls under the fair-use doctrine and was reluctant to take the ad off.</p>
<h3>Megaupload Drops Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group</h3>
<p>THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767</a><br />
Wired.com: <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/</a><br />
THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>GOLAN V. HOLDER &#8211; SUPREME COURT RULING</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931</a></p>
<p>The Supreme Court has handed down a long awaited decision. In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the right to enter into the Uruguay Round Agreement which was an international treaty that allowed foreign rights-holders to claim copyright protection on some works that were previously in the public domain.</p>
<h3>EA Invokes First Amendment For Video Games</h3>
<p>Kotaku: <a href="http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker">http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker</a><br />
THR Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148</a><br />
Gamasutra: <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php">http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php</a></p>
<p>Video game juggernaut Electronic Arts has filed suit against defense conglomerate Textron in California court.  At issue is EA’s right to depict three of Textron’s helicopters in the video game military simulation Battlefield 3.  Textron was allegedly threatening their own suit over trade dress infringement and dilution claims, which prompted the pre-emptive action by Electronic Arts.  EA is seeking a declaratory judgment allowing them to depict the three aircraft (the AH-1Z Viper, the UH-1Y transport helicopter, and the V-22 Osprey) on Fair Use and First Amendment grounds.</p>
<p>Compare: Use of “fictional car brands” in video games.  <a href="http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/">http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/</a></p>
<h3>Velvet Underground Sues Andy Warhol Foundation Over Famous Banana Album Cover</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603</a></p>
<h3>UK Judge Orders Accused Copyright Pirate Extradited to US</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455</a></p>
<p>Richard O’Dwyer, a 23-year old British resident has been ordered for extradition to the United States to face charges of copyright infringement for running a website that links to free films and tv shows.  Mr. O’Dwyer made thousands of British Pounds in advertising on the site.</p>
<p>The UK judge ruled that although the UK authorities are declining to litigate, the US authorities still have a right to try Mr. O’Dwyer in their jurisdiction.</p>
<h3>Just How Egregiously Must a Trademark Plaintiff Act Before a Court Awards Attorneys&#8217; Fees to the Defendant?&#8211;1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com</h3>
<p>Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm</a><br />
Link to case: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees">http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees</a></p>
<p>Section 1117 of the Lanham Act allows for recovery of attorneys’ fees in “exceptional” cases of trademark infringement.  On such case is 1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com. 1-800 Contacts sued their competitor in the Central District of Utah for infringement by competitive keyword advertising.</p>
<h3>Kim Kardashian v. The Gap:</h3>
<p>Yahoo: <a href="http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight--the-gap-vs--kim-kardashian.html">http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight&#8211;the-gap-vs&#8211;kim-kardashian.html</a><br />
Complaint: <a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/">http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/</a></p>
<p>A while back, Kim Kardashian filed suit against the Gap, the clothing retail giant which is the parent company of Old Navy, for using a supposed ‘Kim Kardashian look-a-like in one of the Old Navy commercials. Kardashian sued for $20 million claiming that the commercial “created confusion in the marketplace and violated her rights to her name and likeness.”</p>
<p>Now, The Gap is fighting back, arguing that Kardashian’s reputation was not actually damaged by the commercial.</p>
<h3>Batmobile Design IS protectable by copyright.  Not a &#8220;Useful Article&#8221;</h3>
<p>Last year, DC Comics, a subsidiary of Warner Bros., sued Mark Towles, who operated a business called &#8220;Gotham Garage,&#8221; which sold imitation batmobiles. DC, accused Towles of violating its copyright and trademark and confusing the public into thinking that his cars were authorized products.</p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew, rejected Towles’ argument that a BatMobile is a useful article, not protected by copyright.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/80072393">BATMOBILE CASE:  Order denying Defense Motion to Dismiss</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-28-political-campaigns-combat-helicopters-and-batmobiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 028 &#8211; politics, helicopters &amp; Batmobiles</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-028-politics-helicopters-batmobiles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-028-politics-helicopters-batmobiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#160; Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters A Canadian Lawyer&#8217;s perspectives MegaUpload Golan v. Holder  ruling Helicopters in video games&#8230; need a license? and more GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">A Canadian Lawyer&#8217;s perspectives</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">MegaUpload</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Golan v. Holder  ruling</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">Helicopters in video games&#8230; need a license?</li>
<li style="text-align: left;">and more</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em style="text-align: center;"></em><span style="text-align: center;">for this episode.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-236"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<p><strong>  </strong></p>
<p><strong>Bob Tarantino<br />
</strong>Blog: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/<br />
email:  BTarantino@heenan.ca</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 107px"><a href="http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=1602"><img class="   " style="margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 25px;" title="Bob Tarantino" src="http://www.heenanblaikie.com/media/BioXML_Employees/photos/to_tarantino_b_72dpi_duotone.jpg" alt="" width="97" height="120" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bob Tarantino</p></div>
<p>Bob Tarantino is a partner in the Entertainment Law group at Heenan Blaikie LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between entertainment and intellectual property law. Bob has been recognized as one of Canada’s leading lawyers in the area of entertainment law in the 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in Canada (Woodward/White).  In 2010 he launched Heenan Blaikie&#8217;s Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal, a collaborative blog by members of the firm&#8217;s Entertainment Law group, which was recognized as a co-winner of the Best New Law Blog in the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<h3>NEWT GINGRICH CAMPAIGN’S MUSIC COPYRIGHT ISSUES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/newt-gingrich-eye-of-tiger-lawsuit-285913">Newt Gingrich’s campaign makes the news twice in a week for claims of copyright infringement of a song</a>.   Rude Music Inc., owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_of_the_Tiger"> song “Eye of the Tiger,”</a> filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal district court in Chicago for Gingrich’s use of the song on the campaign trail.</p>
</div>
<h4>CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW APPROACH TO SIMILAR SCENARIO</h4>
<p>The Newt Gingrich Campaign has been using the song, “How You Like Me Now” at campaign events. Third Side Music, a Montreal Record Label that controls the rights to the song sent Gingrich’s team a cease and desist order.</p>
<p>In the US, using a song at the public event requires securing a valid public performance license from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Beyond that, an artist does not have the ability to restrict the use of their song at a political event.</p>
<p>In Canada, the Canadian Copyright Act gives authors moral rights.</p>
<p>The author of a work has the right to the “integrity” of the work which is ingringed if the work is, to the “prejudice of the honor or reputation of the author, distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified; or used in association with a product, service, cause or institution (Section 14.1, Section 28.2).”</p>
<p>Thus, here, the use of the song in association with a cause (the campaign) prejudices the honor or reputation of the author and infringes his moral rights.</p>
<p>Third Side Music is the Canadian music publisher that controls the rights to the song.<br />
Bob’s blog post at Entertainment Media Signal: <a href="http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter">http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter</a></p>
<h3>MITT ROMNEY/NBC</h3>
<p>NBC’s lawyers have asked Romney to take out any reference to the network’s journalism in any other ads as well, but the campaign said it believes it falls under the fair-use doctrine and was reluctant to take the ad off.</p>
<h3>Megaupload Drops Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group</h3>
<p>THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767</a><br />
Wired.com: <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/</a><br />
THR-Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>GOLAN V. HOLDER &#8211; SUPREME COURT RULING</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-ruling-foreign-copyright-laws-282931</a></p>
<p>The Supreme Court has handed down a long awaited decision. In a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the right to enter into the Uruguay Round Agreement which was an international treaty that allowed foreign rights-holders to claim copyright protection on some works that were previously in the public domain.</p>
<h3>EA Invokes First Amendment For Video Games</h3>
<p>Kotaku: <a href="http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker">http://kotaku.com/5874076/ea-invokes-first-amendment-protection-for-video-games-in-trademark-dispute-with-helicopter-maker</a><br />
THR Esq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/battlefield-helicopters-video-games-280148</a><br />
Gamasutra: <a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php">http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/39540/EA_claims_free_speech_in_legal_dispute_over_helicopter_usage_in_Battlefield_3.php</a></p>
<p>Video game juggernaut Electronic Arts has filed suit against defense conglomerate Textron in California court.  At issue is EA’s right to depict three of Textron’s helicopters in the video game military simulation Battlefield 3.  Textron was allegedly threatening their own suit over trade dress infringement and dilution claims, which prompted the pre-emptive action by Electronic Arts.  EA is seeking a declaratory judgment allowing them to depict the three aircraft (the AH-1Z Viper, the UH-1Y transport helicopter, and the V-22 Osprey) on Fair Use and First Amendment grounds.</p>
<p>Compare: Use of “fictional car brands” in video games.  <a href="http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/">http://www.giantbomb.com/fictional-car-brands/92-5156/</a></p>
<h3>Velvet Underground Sues Andy Warhol Foundation Over Famous Banana Album Cover</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/velvet-underground-andy-warhol-bananas-280603</a></p>
<h3>UK Judge Orders Accused Copyright Pirate Extradited to US</h3>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/tvshack-richard-odwyer-copyright-pirate-281455</a></p>
<p>Richard O’Dwyer, a 23-year old British resident has been ordered for extradition to the United States to face charges of copyright infringement for running a website that links to free films and tv shows.  Mr. O’Dwyer made thousands of British Pounds in advertising on the site.</p>
<p>The UK judge ruled that although the UK authorities are declining to litigate, the US authorities still have a right to try Mr. O’Dwyer in their jurisdiction.</p>
<h3>Just How Egregiously Must a Trademark Plaintiff Act Before a Court Awards Attorneys&#8217; Fees to the Defendant?&#8211;1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com</h3>
<p>Technology &amp; Marketing Law Blog: <a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm">http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2012/01/its_really_hard.htm</a><br />
Link to case: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees">http://www.scribd.com/doc/78568762/1-800-Contacts-v-Lens-com-Denial-of-Attorneys-Fees</a></p>
<p>Section 1117 of the Lanham Act allows for recovery of attorneys’ fees in “exceptional” cases of trademark infringement.  On such case is 1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com. 1-800 Contacts sued their competitor in the Central District of Utah for infringement by competitive keyword advertising.</p>
<h3>Kim Kardashian v. The Gap:</h3>
<p>Yahoo: <a href="http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight--the-gap-vs--kim-kardashian.html">http://tv.yahoo.com/news/prepare-for-the-fight&#8211;the-gap-vs&#8211;kim-kardashian.html</a><br />
Complaint: <a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/">http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/2:2011cv05960/507477/1/</a></p>
<p>A while back, Kim Kardashian filed suit against the Gap, the clothing retail giant which is the parent company of Old Navy, for using a supposed ‘Kim Kardashian look-a-like in one of the Old Navy commercials. Kardashian sued for $20 million claiming that the commercial “created confusion in the marketplace and violated her rights to her name and likeness.”</p>
<p>Now, The Gap is fighting back, arguing that Kardashian’s reputation was not actually damaged by the commercial.</p>
<h3>Batmobile Design IS protectable by copyright.  Not a &#8220;Useful Article&#8221;</h3>
<p>Last year, DC Comics, a subsidiary of Warner Bros., sued Mark Towles, who operated a business called &#8220;Gotham Garage,&#8221; which sold imitation batmobiles. DC, accused Towles of violating its copyright and trademark and confusing the public into thinking that his cars were authorized products.</p>
<p>U.S. District Judge Ronald Lew, rejected Towles’ argument that a BatMobile is a useful article, not protected by copyright.</p>
<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/qchZSWToIFw/dark-knight-rises-batmobile-justin%20bieber-286212</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/80072393">BATMOBILE CASE:  Order denying Defense Motion to Dismiss</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/02/episode-028-politics-helicopters-batmobiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode028.mp3" length="65235910" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>  Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: -    Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters   A Canadian Lawyer&#039;s perspectives   MegaUpload   Golan v. Holder  ruling   Helicopters in video games...</itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary> 
Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

 

	Political campaigns raise the ire of copyright holders and newscasters
	A Canadian Lawyer&#039;s perspectives
	MegaUpload
	Golan v. Holder  ruling
	Helicopters in video games... need a license?
	and more

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Hosts:
Gordon P. Firemark
Website:   http://firemark http://theatrelawyer.com,
Twitter: @gfiremark
Tamera Bennett

Website:   http://createprotect.com
Twitter: @tamerabennett


  

Bob Tarantino
Blog: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/
email:  BTarantino@heenan.ca



Bob Tarantino is a partner in the Entertainment Law group at Heenan Blaikie LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between entertainment and intellectual property law. Bob has been recognized as one of Canada’s leading lawyers in the area of entertainment law in the 2010, 2011, and 2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in Canada (Woodward/White).  In 2010 he launched Heenan Blaikie&#039;s Entertainment &amp; Media Law Signal, a collaborative blog by members of the firm&#039;s Entertainment Law group, which was recognized as a co-winner of the Best New Law Blog in the 2010 Canadian Law Blog Awards.

 

 

NEWT GINGRICH CAMPAIGN’S MUSIC COPYRIGHT ISSUES
Newt Gingrich’s campaign makes the news twice in a week for claims of copyright infringement of a song.   Rude Music Inc., owned by Frank Sullivan, a co-author of the song “Eye of the Tiger,” filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in federal district court in Chicago for Gingrich’s use of the song on the campaign trail.


CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW APPROACH TO SIMILAR SCENARIO
The Newt Gingrich Campaign has been using the song, “How You Like Me Now” at campaign events. Third Side Music, a Montreal Record Label that controls the rights to the song sent Gingrich’s team a cease and desist order.

In the US, using a song at the public event requires securing a valid public performance license from ASCAP, BMI, or SESAC. Beyond that, an artist does not have the ability to restrict the use of their song at a political event.

In Canada, the Canadian Copyright Act gives authors moral rights.

The author of a work has the right to the “integrity” of the work which is ingringed if the work is, to the “prejudice of the honor or reputation of the author, distorted, mutilated or otherwise modified; or used in association with a product, service, cause or institution (Section 14.1, Section 28.2).”

Thus, here, the use of the song in association with a cause (the campaign) prejudices the honor or reputation of the author and infringes his moral rights.

Third Side Music is the Canadian music publisher that controls the rights to the song.
Bob’s blog post at Entertainment Media Signal: http://www.entertainmentmedialawsignal.com/2012/01/articles/music/canadian-copyright-and-campaigns-moral-rights-edition/#.TyYIdrXVzI8.twitter
MITT ROMNEY/NBC
NBC’s lawyers have asked Romney to take out any reference to the network’s journalism in any other ads as well, but the campaign said it believes it falls under the fair-use doctrine and was reluctant to take the ad off.
Megaupload Drops Lawsuit Against Universal Music Group
THR-Esq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-universal-music-group-lawsuit-dropped-283767
Wired.com: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/12/youtube-universal-megaupload/
THR-Esq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/megaupload-founder-kim-dotcom-arrest-bail-sopa-284551

 
GOLAN V. HOLDER - SUPREME COURT RULING
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:13:04</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 27 – Top 10 Stories of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/episode-27-%e2%80%93-top-10-stories-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/episode-27-%e2%80%93-top-10-stories-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/episode-27-%e2%80%93-top-10-stories-of-2011/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#8220;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&#8221; Copyright termination 9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH Our Top Ten Stories of 2011 Predictions for 2012 &#160; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/186c2_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&#8221; Copyright termination</li>
<li><span>9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH</span></li>
<li><span>Our Top Ten Stories of 2011</span></li>
<li><span>Predictions for 2012</span></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em><span>for this episode.</span></p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/186c2_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<h2>NEW CASES</h2>
<p><strong></strong><strong><br />
Songwriter’s estate wants control over ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899</a><br />
Link to Complaint: <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf">http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf</a></strong></p>
<p>Veoh is shielded by the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779</a><br />
Link to decision: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777">http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2><strong></strong><strong>TOP 10 STORIES OF 2011</strong></h2>
<div><strong></strong><strong><br />
10.  NCAA Athlete Likeness Litigation<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a><br />
</strong></div>
<p dir="ltr">Link to Opinion:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<p><strong>9. Cariou v. Prince<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince">http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince</a><br />
<a href="http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html">http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html</a><br />
<a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html</a></strong></p>
<p>8. Hangover 2<br />
<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/05/tattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html">Tattoo Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a><br />
<a href="http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2011/04/29/tysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a><br />
The Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true">http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true</a></p>
<p>7. Wizard of Oz<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446</a></p>
<p>6. Betty Boop (Fleischer v. AVELA)<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y</a></p>
<p>5. Brown v. EMA<br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></p>
<p>4. Tenenbaum (&amp; Jammie Thomas)<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154</a></p>
<p>3.  Golan v. Holder</p>
<p>2. Righthaven<br />
Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok"> http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a><br />
Vegas Inc.:<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/"> http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p>1. UMG cases (starting with Eminmen, Rob Zombie, Chuck D)<br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p>NEW FILING</p>
<p>And now in line with the UMG cases, the My Sharona filing:<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/episode-27-%e2%80%93-top-10-stories-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 27 &#8211; Top ten stories of 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/entertainment-law-update-episode-27-top-ten-stories-of-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/entertainment-law-update-episode-27-top-ten-stories-of-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: &#8220;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&#8221; Copyright termination 9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH Our Top Ten Stories of 2011 Predictions for 2012 &#160; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align: left;">&#8220;Santa Claus Is Coming to town&#8221; Copyright termination</li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">9th Circuit upholds DMCA Safe Harbor for VEOH</span></li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">Our Top Ten Stories of 2011</span></li>
<li><span style="text-align: center;">Predictions for 2012</span></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em style="text-align: center;"></em><span style="text-align: center;">for this episode.</span></p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-231"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p>Hosts:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark </a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a>,<br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">NEW CASES</h2>
<p><strong></strong><strong><br />
Songwriter’s estate wants control over ‘Santa Claus is coming to town’<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriters-estate-wants-control-santa-275899</a><br />
Link to Complaint: <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf">http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/SantaTune.pdf</a></strong></p>
<p>Veoh is shielded by the safe harbor provisions of the DMCA<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/copyright-case-universal-music-veoh-275779</a><br />
Link to decision: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777">http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/76172777</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong></strong><strong>TOP 10 STORIES OF 2011</strong></h2>
<div><strong></strong><strong><br />
10.  NCAA Athlete Likeness Litigation<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a><br />
</strong></div>
<p dir="ltr">Link to Opinion:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<p><strong>9. Cariou v. Prince<br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince">http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince</a><br />
<a href="http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html">http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html</a><br />
<a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html</a></strong></p>
<p>8. Hangover 2<br />
<a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/05/tattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html">Tattoo Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a><br />
<a href="http://offthebench.nbcsports.com/2011/04/29/tysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a><br />
The Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true">http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2011/dec/23/louis-vuitton-hangover-part-2?newsfeed=true</a></p>
<p>7. Wizard of Oz<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446</a></p>
<p>6. Betty Boop (Fleischer v. AVELA)<br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y</a></p>
<p>5. Brown v. EMA<br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></p>
<p>4. Tenenbaum (&amp; Jammie Thomas)<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/music-pirate-argues-67500-penalty-68154</a></p>
<p>3.  Golan v. Holder</p>
<p>2. Righthaven<br />
Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok"> http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a><br />
Vegas Inc.:<a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/"> http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p>1. UMG cases (starting with Eminmen, Rob Zombie, Chuck D)<br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p>NEW FILING</p>
<p>And now in line with the UMG cases, the My Sharona filing:<br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/knack-bruce-gary-sister-sues-my-sharona-itunes-amazon-276149</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2012/01/entertainment-law-update-episode-27-top-ten-stories-of-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 26 – Attack of the Little Trees!</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-26-%e2%80%93-attack-of-the-little-trees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-26-%e2%80%93-attack-of-the-little-trees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-26-%e2%80%93-attack-of-the-little-trees/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: PROTECT IP /SOPA CROWD FUNDING BILL Ghost Hunters &#8211; Cert Denied Rob Zombie Class Action moves toward class certification Viacom/ YouTube case sees extraordinary order Grooveshark sued by UMG Sound Recording Copyright Terminations begin Who owns &#8220;La Dolce Vita&#8221; Does Eastland records have a 50/50...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>PROTECT IP /SOPA</li>
<li>CROWD FUNDING BILL</li>
<li>Ghost Hunters &#8211; Cert Denied</li>
<li>Rob Zombie Class Action moves toward class certification</li>
<li>Viacom/ YouTube case sees extraordinary order</li>
<li>Grooveshark sued by UMG</li>
<li>Sound Recording Copyright Terminations begin</li>
<li>Who owns &#8220;La Dolce Vita&#8221;</li>
<li>Does Eastland records have a 50/50 chance in court?</li>
<li>Car Freshner v. Getty Images &#8211; attack of the little trees</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span>Hosts:  </span></p>
<p><strong>Gordon P. Firemark</strong><br />
Website:   <a href="http://firemark/">http://firemark<span> </span></a><a href="http://theatrelawyer.com/">http://theatrelawyer.com</a><span>,</span><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/gfiremark">@gfiremark</a></p>
<p><strong>Tamera Bennett</strong></p>
<p>Website:   <a href="http://createprotect.com/">http://createprotect.com</a><br />
Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/tamerabennett">@tamerabennett</a></p>
<h3>Guest:<br />
<strong></strong></h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-803" style="border-width: 2px;border-color: black;border-style: solid;margin: 10px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_PeterKaufmanHeadshot.thumbnail-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="120" height="180" /></a>Peter Kaufman</strong> of the <strong>Kaufman Entertainment Law Group</strong> in Los Angeles joins us in this episode.</p>
<p>Peter practices in the fields of film, television, music and intellectual property.  He is an Arbitrator for the Independent Film and Television Alliance,  and a member of the Academy of Television Arts &amp; Sciences.   He is also a frequent speaker in the United States and abroad including USC’s School of Cinema Arts, CeBit – Germany, the Atlas Film and TV Finance Conference and the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s yearly symposia on entertainment law. Mr. Kaufman is the former chair of the Intellectual Property and Entertainment Law Section of the Los Angeles County Bar Association.</p>
<p> Read Peter’s blog at <a href="http://dealfatigue.com/">http://dealfatigue.com</a>, and follow him on twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/dealfatigue">@dealfatigue</a>.</p>
<hr />
<h2>PENDING LEGISLATION</h2>
<div><strong>Protect IP Act and Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)</strong>:</div>
<p>Ars Technica, Proposed Law: <a href="http://static.arstechnica.net/2011/10/26/SOPA.pdf">http://static.arstechnica.net/2011/10/26/SOPA.pdf</a></p>
<p>Public Knowledge: <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/what-warners-recklessness-says-about-sopa">http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/what-warners-recklessness-says-about-sopa</a></p>
<p>Warner Bros. response: <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/warner-bros-admits-sending-hotfile-false-takedown-requests-111109/">http://torrentfreak.com/warner-bros-admits-sending-hotfile-false-takedown-requests-111109/</a></p>
<p>Brief Summary of the Proposed Law</p>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">PROTECT IP Act (short for Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011)  was introduced on May 12, 2011 by Senator Patrick Leahy.  It is a rewriting of the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA).  The House version of the bill, the &#8220;Stop Online Piracy Act&#8221; (SOPA) was proposed on October 26, 2011.</p>
<p>The Bill(s):</p>
<ul>
<li>Create a private cauise of action against sites that are “dedicated to the theft of U.S. Property”</li>
<li>Allows the DOJ  stop payments and advertising on such sites.</li>
<li>Bars search engines from linking to those sites, as well as ordering domain name services to de-list the sites.</li>
<li>Grants immunity to those who report such infringing sites</li>
</ul>
<p>CAUTIONARY TALE:</p>
<p>Warner Bros. has admitted to abusing its DMCA takedown rights in another context&#8230; what’s to stop them and others like them from abusing this law’s mechanism  to take down entire sites?</p>
<p><strong>CROWD FUNDING REGULATIONS</strong></p>
<p>WSJ: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203707504577008021536730062.html?KEYWORDS=crowd-funding">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203707504577008021536730062.html?KEYWORDS=crowd-funding</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">On November 3, 2011, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Entrepreneur Access to Capital Act, H.R. 2930. The bill will allow an SEC registration exemption for crowd-funding, whereby entrepreneurs could raise up to $2 million in equity from individual investors, but must provide audited financial statements if the total money raised exceeds $1 million.</p>
<h2>FOLLOW &#8211; UPS</h2>
<p><strong>SUPREME COURT NIXES GHOST HUNTERS CASE</strong></p>
<p>Variety: <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118045749">http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118045749</a></p>
<p>The U.S. Supreme court has denied the defense’s petition for cert on the question whether Copyright law pre-empts state law breach of implied contract and breach of confidence claims.  Earlier this year, the 9th circuit ruled that it does NOT.  So&#8230;The case now heads back to the district court for trial.</p>
<p><strong>UNIVERSAL MUSIC LOSES BID TO DISMISS CLASS ACTION OVER DIGITAL REVENUE (ROB ZOMBIE/RICK JAMES)</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-lawsuit-rob-zombie-rick-james-256662">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-lawsuit-rob-zombie-rick-james-256662</a></p>
<p>UMG claims that digital downloads and ringtones should be classified as “sales,” garnering the artist a 10-20 percent royalty rate.  Rob Zombie, etc. claim that they should be classified as “licenses,” which would be closer to a 50/50 split.</p>
<p><strong>VIACOM/YOUTUBE</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/youtube-viacom-appeal-lawsuit-258734">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/youtube-viacom-appeal-lawsuit-258734</a>; <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/viacom-youtube-interpretation-copyright-law-260192">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/viacom-youtube-interpretation-copyright-law-260192</a><br />
TechDirt: <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/12320516711/viacom-says-that-letting-people-view-videos-phones-youtube-loses-dmca-safe-harbors.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/12320516711/viacom-says-that-letting-people-view-videos-phones-youtube-loses-dmca-safe-harbors.shtml</a></p>
<p>The 2nd Circuit now hearing the case issued an extraordinary order asking both sides to comment further on the “red flag” provisions in the DMCA.</p>
</div>
<h2>CASES TO WATCH</h2>
<div><strong>UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP SUES GROOVESHARK</strong></div>
<p>THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-grooveshark-copyright-lawsuit-263714">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/universal-music-grooveshark-copyright-lawsuit-263714</a></p>
<p>Digital Music News: <a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2011/111123grooveshark?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/permalink/2011/111123grooveshark?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter</a></p>
<p>Direct Link to Complaint: <a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/uploads/b9/82/b9829ebb37bd5f1a25fc839df6ea6db7/grooveshark.pdf">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/uploads/b9/82/b9829ebb37bd5f1a25fc839df6ea6db7/grooveshark.pdf</a></p>
<p>UMG contends that Grooveshark is a “pirate website” that streams unauthorized copyrighted material to its users (reportedly 600 million minutes a month to 30 million unique users).</p>
<p dir="ltr">The interesting twist in this case is that UMG also accuses Grooveshark employees, by name, including the CEO and other senior executives, of uploading over 113,000 unauthorized songs to the site.</p>
<p>Chart detailing the alleged song uploads by Grooveshark employees -<br />
<a href="http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/legal/grooveshark2.jpg">http://www.digitalmusicnews.com/legal/grooveshark2.jpg</a></p>
<p><strong>First Sound Recording Copyright Termination Suit Filed</strong></p>
<p>Lommen Abdo: <a href="http://www.lommen.com/Firm-News/Legal-Headlines/Termination-of-Copyright-Transfers.aspx">http://www.lommen.com/Firm-News/Legal-Headlines/Termination-of-Copyright-Transfers.aspx</a></p>
<p>Practice Point: If you have a client who is a legacy songwriter or recording artist and who signed an agreement in 1978 or shortly after, now would be a good time to review those prior agreements and catalogs and serve notices of termination under the U.S. Copyright Act. Failure to do so may result in the loss of valuable reversion rights.</p>
<p><strong>PARAMOUNT SUES FOR OWNERSHIP OF LA DOLCE VITA</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/paramount-sues-fellini-la-dolce-vita-257681">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/paramount-sues-fellini-la-dolce-vita-257681</a></p>
<p>Paramount filed a complaint in California federal court against International Media Films, who also claims to be the valid copyright owner of La Dolce Vita.  Both claim ownership through a convoluted chain of title. The outcome of the Golan v. Holder case might make Paramount’s claim moot. If the Supreme Court restores copyrighted works to the public domain, including La Dolce Vita, then no one actually would have a valid copyright in the film and it would be in the public domain.</p>
<p><strong>MUSIC LABEL SUES DEMANDING ‘50/50’ DISTRIBUTORS CHANGE FILM TITLE</strong></p>
<p>THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/50-50-movie-seth-rogen-lawsuit-263572">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/50-50-movie-seth-rogen-lawsuit-263572</a><br />
50/50 TM info: <a href="http://www.trademarks411.com/marks/78228773-phifty-50">http://www.trademarks411.com/marks/78228773-phifty-50</a></p>
<p>Eastland Music Group filed the federal lawsuit in Illinois claiming it has been using the 50/50 mark since 2000 in connection with entertainment services and products. As evidence, they point to its website, phifty-50.com (fifty spelled with a “ph”), which currently has a sign post on its front page adorned with “50/50” (fifty slash fifty like the film title).</p>
<p>They are demanding a permanent injunction against use of the title, the destruction of all products where &#8220;50-50&#8243; is affixed, and an award of all of the film&#8217;s sales and revenues as a result of the alleged infringement.</p>
<p><strong>CAR FRESHNER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASE</strong>:</p>
<p>Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ffd801cb-72c3-49fb-bd23-5ff8df0daf9b">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=ffd801cb-72c3-49fb-bd23-5ff8df0daf9b</a></p>
<p>Link to decision: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/67629206/Decision-Tree-Freshner-Getty">http://www.scribd.com/doc/67629206/Decision-Tree-Freshner-Getty</a></p>
<p>The Car Freshner Corporation, maker of that tree-shaped, rear-view mirror hanging car air freshener is suing Getty Images for trademark infringement over a number of images in its stock photo inventory that include a tree-shaped air freshener.</p>
<p>Getty filed a motion to dismiss but in late October 2011, the court denied that motion. The opinion reads: “after reviewing the images on Defendants’ website containing the Tree Marks, the Court finds plausible the allegation that a purchaser and/or user of Defendants’ images could be confused as to the source of origin of the images, believing incorrectly that ‘they originate from, are sponsored by, are approved by, or in someway are affiliated with Plaintiffs.’”</p>
<h2>NEW FILINGS TO WATCH OUT FOR</h2>
<div><strong>CAPITOL RECORDS v. DEFRIES</strong></div>
<p>Jason Pascal, VP of The Orchard, brought our attention to this complaint,  filed in the SDNY. The former manager of David Bowie, Mick Ronson and others seems to be taking the position that anyone meeting what he deems to be a co-author has a right to non-exclusively license the whole master.  Consequently, via his relationship with the  Ronson estate, he digitally released Pin-Ups by David Bowie, American Fool by John Mellencamp, Bad Company by Bad Company, Transformer by Lou Reed, and several others.  All of these titles had performances by Mick Ronson and the defendant is claiming he is a co-author.  The record labels  finally sued.</p>
<p><strong>TAYMOR v. Eight Legged Productions, LLC</strong></p>
<div><strong></strong><br />
Playwright and Director Julie Taymor, who earlier this year was replaced on the beleaguered production of Spiderman, has filed suit against the shows’ producers and her co-writer alleging breach of contract unfair competition, and copyright claims relating to the show’s use of material she created in subsequent productions and tours without her approval, and for failure to pay royalties due.</div>
<div>Do us a favor (ok, 3):</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Subscribe in iTunes, or your favorite music software.</li>
<li>Give us a review</li>
<li>Tell your friends about our show!</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>Follow us on twitter. Just follow <a href="http://twitter.com/entlawupdate">@entlawupdate</a> and you&#8217;ll be notified about our episodes as they become available. We also tweet about our upcoming topics, when we&#8217;re looking for guests, and so on., so if you have topics you think we should cover, please feel free to send us your ideas, suggestions, etc.</div>
<p dir="ltr">And of course, you can email us.  The address is <a href="mailto:entertainmentlawupdate@gmail.com">entertainmentlawupdate@gmail.com</a>. and our listener, voice-feedback phone line is 310-243-6231</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-26-%e2%80%93-attack-of-the-little-trees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 025 – What’s with all the Zombies?</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Zombie Righthaven Golan v. Holder at the USSC Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity? ReDigi &#8211; digital music first sale doctrine? Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement Costumes and copyright? and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Zombie Righthaven</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder at the USSC</li>
<li>Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?</li>
<li>ReDigi &#8211; digital music first sale doctrine?</li>
<li>Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement</li>
<li>Costumes and copyright?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>
<h3>FOLLOW &#8211; UPS</h3>
<p><strong>Righthaven &#8212; almost dead, but not quite</strong><br />
Vegas Inc.: <a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/">http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p><strong>Hollywood eyes fate of copyright law (Golan v. Holder update)</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528</a></p>
<p>Link to mp3 of the entire oral argument:<a href="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545"> http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545</a></p>
<p><strong>Public Domain Info Project</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pdinfo.com/">http://www.pdinfo.com/ </a></p>
<p><strong>Middle Tennessee State University Center for Popular Music:</strong><br />
<a href="http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/">http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/</a></p>
<p><strong>Monroe Publicity Rights </strong><br />
Law360: <a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881?nl_pk=26cb3b47-8864-4d65-9661-d1383057df81&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881</a></p>
<p><strong>George Clinton dispute regarding digital downloads.</strong><br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p><strong>ReDigi &#8211; can you legally resell your music?</strong><br />
TechCrunch: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/</a></p>
<p><strong>Does Warner Bros. Really Have Exclusive Movie Rights to a Story Posted on Reddit?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726</a><br />
<strong>Can MTV Sue New Jersey For Nixing &#8216;Jersey Shore&#8217; Tax Credit?</strong><br />
NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html</a><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609</a><br />
NJ.com: <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html">http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html</a></p>
<p><strong>80’s Hair Band Poison sued for allegedly stealing songs twenty-five years ago</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story">http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story</a></p>
<p><strong>Could Ben Affleck be liable for The Town-inspired robberies?</strong><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/10/can-ben-affleck-be-liable-for-the-town-nyc-robberies.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">http://blogs.findlaw.com</a><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Power Rangers Halloween Costumes &#8211; Can They Be Copyrighted?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742</a></p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Hurt Locker&#8217; Case Dismissed on Anti-Slapp motion</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter</a><br />
Casp.net: <a href="http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/">http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/</a></p>
<p><strong>Man claims that The Hangover II was based on his life story</strong><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a></p>
<p><strong>Quarterback’s suit against EA dismissed</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01d5c62d-8f1b-4596-a958-2600b5efc96f&amp;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2011-10-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Actress Sues iMDB for revealing age</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 024 – Wronghaven, Immaterial Girls &amp; Noodle Bowls</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more $10 infringement settlements Tenenbaum award reinstated Indies sue Limewire Betty Boop ruling revised Material Girl trademark suit proceeds You can&#8217;t copyright food GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/47afa_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more</li>
<li>$10 infringement settlements</li>
<li>Tenenbaum award reinstated</li>
<li>Indies sue Limewire</li>
<li>Betty Boop ruling revised</li>
<li>Material Girl trademark suit proceeds</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t copyright food</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/47afa_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>The end of Righthaven?</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Wired: <span><span><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">www</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">wired</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">threatlevel</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medianews</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">dumb</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">idea</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/?</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">ArsTechnica: <span><span><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">arstechnica</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tech</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">policy</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">news</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">copyright</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">suits</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tossed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">in</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">colorado</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">too</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">ars</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">?</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">campaign</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Law firm offers $10 settlements to music copyright infringers</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT"> PaidContent: <span><span><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">http</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">://</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">paidcontent</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">.</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">org</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">article</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/419-10-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">settlement</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">offers</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">the</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">entertainment</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">industrys</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">new</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">copyright</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">tactic</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong>Court Upholds $675 Judgment Against Joel Tenenbaum</strong></p>
<p>FindLaw: <span><span><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">http</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">://</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">blogs</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">findlaw</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">com</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">first</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">_</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">reinstates</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-675000-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">judgment</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">against</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">joel</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">tenenbaum</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">html</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">?=</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">features</a></span></span></p>
<p>Goldman blog: <span><span><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">http</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">://</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">blog</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">ericgoldman</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">org</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">archives</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/2011/09/1</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">st</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">circuit</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">rei</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">htm</a></span></span></p>
<p>Order: <span><span><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">http</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">://</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docs</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docstoc</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">com</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/29137/470628</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">6-</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">507-41</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">ce</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-8</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">cbd</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-0309210</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">c</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">748</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">e</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Independent Labels Sue LimeWire for their Share of Settlement</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">/695</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">vmhy</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span><span><strong><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Saregama</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">v</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Timbaland</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">, </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">et</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">al</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">.</a></strong></span></span><span><span><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Case</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">No</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. 10-10626 (11</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">th</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Cir</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">., </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">March</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf"> 25, 2011)?</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>2nd Cir. Will Hear Richard Prince’s Photo Use Appeal</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Law360: <span><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">http</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">://</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">www</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">law</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">360.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">com</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">ip</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">articles</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/271962</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">NYTimes: <span><span><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">http</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">://</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">artsbeat</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">blogs</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">nytimes</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">com</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/2011/09/15/</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">court</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">allows</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">richard</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">prince</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">to</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">appeal</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">copyright</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">decision</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong><span>Betty Boop no longer threat to Detroit Lions, Princeton Tigers, or Yogi Bear — oh my!</span></strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">ttgb</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">2</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">y</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Opinion: <span><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">http</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">://</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">www</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">ca</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">9.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">uscourts</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">gov</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">datastore</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">opinions</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/2011/08/19/09-56317.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> &#8217;<span>Cause we are living in a material world! But it doesn&#8217;t belong to Madonna!</span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">6</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">58</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">d</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">7</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-83</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">ae</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-45</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">3-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">353-32</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">5</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">fa</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">48741</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">source</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">medium</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">HTML</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">email</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Body</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Federal</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">section</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">campaign</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">subscriber</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">feed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">content</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+2011-09-20&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">term</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a></span></span></p>
<p>THREsq: <span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">http</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">://</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">www</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">hollywoodreporter</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">com</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">thr</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">esq</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">judge</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">rejects</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">madonnas</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">trademark</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">claim</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-231562</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><span>Ninth Circuit adopts lower court’s use of its own &#8220;blades of chaos&#8221; to filter out the unprotectable elements of a plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim</span></h1>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">yv</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">68</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">kl</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span><strong>You can&#8217;t copyright a bowl of food</strong></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> KIM SENG COMPANY v J&amp;A IMPORTERS, INC., ET AL.</p>
<p align="LEFT"> Lexology: <span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">hgcagh</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Decision: <a href="http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf"><span><span>http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf</span></span></a></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span>Cases mentioned:</span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Feist</a> <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Publ</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">&#8216;</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">ns</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Rural</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Tel</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Serv</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">., 499 </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">U</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">.</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">S</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. 340, 361 (1991)</a></span>.</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Satava</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lowry</a></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lamps</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Plus</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Seattle</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lighting</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Fixture</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a></span>. I</p>
<h4 align="CENTER">Quick-Takes</h4>
<p><strong>EU Adds 20 years to Music Copyrights</strong></p>
<p>Ars: <span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">y</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">lojz</a></span></span></p>
<p>EU Directive: <span><span><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">https</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">://</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">www</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">consilium</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">europa</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">eu</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">uedocs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">cms</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">_</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">data</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">docs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pressdata</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">en</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">intm</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/124570.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<h4 align="CENTER">New Filings</h4>
<p><strong>Deadline’s Parent Company Sues THR’s Parent Company for Copyright Infringement</strong></p>
<p>LA Times: <span><span><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">http</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">://</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimesblogs</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimes</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">com</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">entertainmentnewsbuzz</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">deadline</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">hollywood</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">reporter</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">lawsuit</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">html</a></span></span></p>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c048_zemified_e.png?x-id=23a81528-f24d-4e60-a6c0-6596b7ad5fe8" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELU Episode 023 – Monkeying Around with Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;. Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict Wizard of Oz film characters still protected First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods Monkeying around with copyright and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDITf or this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/47afa_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;.</li>
<li>Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict</li>
<li>Wizard of Oz film characters still protected</li>
<li>First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods</li>
<li>Monkeying around with copyright</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em></em>f or this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/47afa_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span>Follow Ups</span></p>
<div><strong>Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok">http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a>The cases in question:</div>
<div>Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).</p>
<p><a href="http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2011/04/15/rhavenstrategicalliance.pdf">Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement.</a></p>
<p><strong>Disney Appeals $319 Million &#8216;Millionaire&#8217; Verdict</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538</a></p>
<p><strong>Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">=====================</p>
<h4>Feature Stories</h4>
<p><strong>Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255</a><br />
Link to decision:<a href="http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR"> http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR</a></p>
<p>If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.</p>
<p><a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/188/239/case.html">Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company</a>, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the<br />
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright"> copyright. </a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters:</strong><a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/"> http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/62481366/John-Wiley-amp-Sons-v-Kirtsaeng#fullscreen:on">John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896.</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Mine o&#8217; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese</strong></p>
<p>Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz"> http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz</a><br />
Decision:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt"> http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt</a></p>
<h4>Quick Takes</h4>
<p><strong>Jury Sides With DreamWorks Animation in &#8216;Kung Fu Panda&#8217; Case</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019</a></p>
<p><strong>Project Runway Hit With Copyright Lawsuit from Photographer</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618</a></p>
<p><strong>The Wild Lawsuit Against Bravo&#8217;s &#8216;Million Dollar Decorators&#8217;</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179</a></p>
<p><strong>Copyright for All Primates?</strong><br />
Nearby Café:<a href="http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129"> http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129</a><br />
Art Info:<a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/"> http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/</a></p>
<p><strong>Real World Sued For Failing to Blur Shadow Dancers</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947</a></p>
<p><strong>A Village Person Test The Copyright Law</strong><br />
NYTimes:<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1"> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1</a></p>
<p><strong>Marlon Brando Estate Sues Over &#8216;Brando&#8217; Sofas</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596</a></p>
<p>NEW US CODE SEARCH TOOL  <a href="http://uscodebeta.house.gov/">http://uscodebeta.house.gov/</a></p>
<p>THE FAIR USE CALCULATOR AT <a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">HTTP</a><a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">://librarycopyright.net/fairuse </a></p>
<h4>not legal advice, but a useful tool to document your arguments on the 4 factors&#8230;.</h4>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 22 – Violent Games, (anti) Slapps and other painless fun</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Hangover Tattoo case settled Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot California Video Game Law unconstitutional You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hangover Tattoo case settled</li>
<li>Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot</li>
<li>California Video Game Law unconstitutional</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.</li>
<li>Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes<!-- ol{margin:0;padding:0}p{margin:0}.c9{width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c6{color:#000099;font-size:14pt;font-weight:bold}.c2{font-size:14pt;font-family:Georgia}.c7{color:#333333;font-family:Trebuchet MS}.c1{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c3{color:#454545;font-family:Georgia}.c16{background-color:#ea9999}.c8{text-align:center}.c18{color:#454545}.c10{color:#000099}.c12{font-weight:bold}.c11{font-style:italic}.c17{font-size:12pt}.c14{background-color:#ffffff}.c0{direction:ltr}.c15{font-size:14pt}.c13{font-family:Georgia}.c4{text-decoration:underline}.c19{font-size:10pt}.c5{height:11pt}body{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial}h1{padding-top:24pt;color:#000000;font-size:24pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt} --></h2>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">Warner Bros. Settles &#8216;Hangover II&#8217; Tattoo Lawsuit </a></span></h2>
<p><span>Whitmill v. Warner Bros.</span><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377</a></span></p>
<p><span>.</span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">Second Circuit Finds &#8220;Hot News&#8221; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act</a></span></h2>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>In </span><span>Barclay&#8217;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com</span><span>, </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">Link to decision</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">.</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Copyright Litigation Blog: </span><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">Rebecca Black&#8217;s &#8216;Friday&#8217; Taken Off YouTube</a></span></h2>
<p><span> Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893</a></span></p>
<p><span>TMZ: </span><span><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law </a></span></h2>
<p><span> Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology:</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>California video game law: </span><span><a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html">http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html</a></span></p>
<p><span>Supreme Court decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf</a></span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">Is the idea to use a hair dryer as a weapon copyrightable? No, says Second Circuit.</a></span></h2>
<p><span>Cabell v. Sony Pictures </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures">http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures"> </a></span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Shock Jocks&#8217; Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Murphy v. Millenium Radio Group</span><span>, LLC.</span></p>
<p><span> Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf">http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span>Law360: </span><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">Songwriter Wins Round in Legal Battle with Summit Over &#8216;Twilight&#8217; Song</a></span></h1>
<p><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">Bridal shop loses trademark rights for naked licensing</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enter., Inc</span><span>., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011).</span></p>
<p><span>Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span> See also: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>See also, </span><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3467365781852035897">FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network</a></span><span>, __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 4749044, No. 08-16382 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2010).  Abandonment of trademark by naked license.</span></p>
<p><span> RCFP: </span><span><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931</a></span></p>
<p><span> <a href="http://www.legal-project.org/149/anti-slapp-statutes-in-the-us-by-state">List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State </a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 21 – Tough Cookies and Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers Tennessee Neftlix Law Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants Disney and Dish Network duke it out One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies Point Break Parody lawsuit &#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand? and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers</li>
<li>Tennessee Neftlix Law</li>
<li>Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants</li>
<li>Disney and Dish Network duke it out</li>
<li>One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies</li>
<li>Point Break Parody lawsuit</li>
<li>&#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<h3>Follow Ups</h3>
<h4><a href="http://zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-problems-of-not-clearing-copyright-issues-before-filming-starts/">Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p&#8230;</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a></h4>
<p>Link to Opinion: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/">District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739">Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York<br />
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739</a></h4>
<p>Also reported at :  <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hayden-christensens-lawsuit-usa-tossed-187290">Hayden Christensen&#8217;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.law360.com/articles/245836">HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-harley-189775">BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO">Link to the Brando boots on Amazon.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO"> </a> (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”&#8230; but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon&#8230; it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name&#8230;.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-749 aligncenter" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_Amazon.com_-brando-boot_-Shoes-1-300x175.png" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Legislation and Regulatory</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.musicrow.com/2011/06/tennessee-signs-law-prohibiting-netflix-password-sharing/">Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime &#8211; Legislation &amp; Policymaking &#8211; FindLaw Blotter</a></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">Copyright Office Rules on Termination &#8220;Gap Grants.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf">http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">www.copyright.gov</a></p>
<h3>Rulings  &amp; Opinions</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695">Judge Denies Disney&#8217;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-team-6-trademark.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">Disney Surrenders to Navy on &#8216;SEAL Team 6&#8242; Trademark &#8211; Celebrity Intellectual Property &#8211; Celebrity Justice blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-te&#8230;</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application/">http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704">NY Bakery Owner Sues Scripps Network Over Food Network Show &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704 </a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657">Who Has the Right to Parody Keanu Reeves&#8217; Work In &#8216;Point Break&#8217;? &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657</a></h4>
<p>The case is Keeling v. New Rock Theatre Productions  Opinion is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/18/Point%20Break%20Live!.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/movie-rights-30-year-old-188604">Movie Rights To 30-Year-Old Book at Center of Lawsuit .</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-just-ask-john-elway.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TrademarkLawyerAttorneyLawFirmRegistrationInfringement+%28Trademark+Law+Practice+Alerts%29">Personal Names can be Protected as Trademarks: Just Ask John Elway tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-&#8230;</a></h4>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J">http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6debc5d9-098d-4a9a-a918-24ab056b3803&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-19&amp;utm_term=">Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested</a></h4>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD">http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h6>Related articles</h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/20/nothing-like-a-brando-harley-davidson-sued-over-name-of-new-line-of-boots/">Nothing Like a Brando: Harley-Davidson Sued Over Name of New Line of Boots</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-laced-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Laced Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-cast-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Cast Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-gains-big-after-ubs-report-2011-06-06?siteid=rss&amp;rss=1">Harley-Davidson gains big after UBS report</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-motorcycle-boots/">Shoe Cravings: Motorcycle Boots</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.onlineshoes.com/blog/outdoor/going-wild-how-to-find-the-right-motorcycle-boots">Going Wild: The Motorcycle Diaries</a> (onlineshoes.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-men%25e2%2580%2599s-boots-for-spring/">Shoe Cravings: Men&#8217;s Boots for Spring</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2011/04/how-to-sell-a-harley-davidson/">How to sell a Harley-Davidson</a> (hellforleathermagazine.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/30/the-harley-davidson-scooter/">The Harley-Davidson Scooter</a> (neatorama.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-receives-short-term-buy-from-ubs-2011-06-06?siteid=rss">Harley Davidson receives short-term buy from UBS</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://stillisstillmoving.com/willienelson/american-icons-willie-nelson-harley-davidson-and-country-music-throwdown/">American Icons: Willie Nelson, Harley Davidson, and Country Music Throwdown</a> (stillisstillmoving.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/17/the-mouse-takes-bin-laden-disney-moves-to-claim-trademark-to-seal-team-six/">The Mouse Takes Bin Laden: Disney Moves To Claim Trademark to &#8220;Seal Team Six&#8221;</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li><a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/5873500207/disney-trademark-seal-team-6">Disney abandons plan to trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (shortformblog.tumblr.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/05/26/seal-team-6-disney/">Disney backs away from &#8216;SEAL Team 6′ trademark</a> (insidemovies.ew.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://thedailywh.at/2011/05/25/follow-up-of-the-day-11/">Follow Up of the Day: Disney Withdraws SEAL Team 6 Trademark Applications</a> (thedailywh.at)</li>
<li><a href="http://videogum.com/309931/update-disney-withdraws-application-to-trademark-seal-team-6/behind-the-scenes/">UPDATE: Disney Withdraws Application To Trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6″</a> (videogum.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20062914-10391698.html">Disney trademarks &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (cbsnews.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576345752703592770.html">Disney Retreats&#8230;</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2011/05/disney-drops-its-trademark-application.html">&#8220;Disney Drops Its Trademark Application For SEAL Team Six&#8221; and related posts</a> (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)</li>
</ul>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f27a8_zemified_e.png?x-id=c9436f93-0b96-4c6a-a361-be925a63ea5f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 20 – Tattoos and Topiaries</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc. Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims Vandals smear Variety No moral rights in landscape design? Tattoo Law and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/07916_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.</li>
<li>Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million</li>
<li>Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims</li>
<li>Vandals smear Variety</li>
<li>No moral rights in landscape design?</li>
<li>Tattoo Law</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/07916_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span>Follow Ups</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/girls-gone-wild-founder-cleared-in-civil-case">Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case </a></span></p>
<p><strong> Righthaven</strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/05/copyright-troll-clobbered-judge-finds.html">Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/f87x8DA9KWI/">Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Futurelawyer/~3/OtqxJLDygi8/but-your-honor-we-bought-the-right-to-sue.html">But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! </a></span></p>
<h4><span>Bratz</span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/236101?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights</a></span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlagiarismToday/~3/hjK76Sue_Ks/">How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You</a></span></h4>
<p><span>Bryant/MGA v. Mattel</span><span> (Bratz dolls)</span></p>
<p><span>Bloomberg:</span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl">http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl</a></span></p>
<p><span>LA Times:</span><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"> </a></span><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found that<br />
Mattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company </span><span>$88.5 million</span><span>. An 8-person jury<br />
unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that </span><span>Mattel did not own the rights to the<br />
Bratz dolls, </span><span>early models or sketches; and said that </span><span>MGA did not steal trade secrets.</span><span>ew trial.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h4><span>9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law</span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/08-56954/08-56954-2011-05-04.html">Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al</a></span></h4>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Alien vs Predator  infringement </strong>plaintiff loses on access AND similarity</span></p>
<h4><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.</a></span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Lexology:</a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn">http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn</a></span></p>
<p><span>Opinion:</span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg">http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"></a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground&#8230; case will move to California</span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fvariety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHGqM2u7f7HuWnvUIVTbo74ji6IlA">Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute &#8230;</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>THREsq:</span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026"> </a></span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/04/punk-band-wins-legal-skirmish-lambastes-plaintiff-and-opposing-counsel-in-animated-video.html">Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel in<br />
Animated Video</a></span></p>
<h4><span> </span></h4>
<h4><span>Moral Rights in your backyard?</span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=682ca05d-0a4d-44f1-b5b5-fc004af865ff&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-26&amp;utm_term=">Landscaper artist’s &#8220;rights of integrity&#8221; not violated by city trimming his garden</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span><span> TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s </span><span>claim that his rights of integrity were violated when t</span><span>he city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park</span><span>. </span><span>The Court held that a </span><span>garden cannot be copyrighted</span><span> and thus, an </span>artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Fake Script infringed by blog?</span></strong></p>
<p><span>Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml"></a></span></p>
<h4><span>A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim</span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-upholds-4m-verdict-176984">Appeals<br />
Court Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#8216;Flip This House” </a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Comic Book Cases </span></strong></p>
<p><span> </span>Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.</span></p>
<p><span> </span>Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In the latest move in Warner Bros. attempt to hold on to its stake in Superman, a federal judge judge has rejected Warner Bros.’ attempt to gain access to secret document that allegedly show an agreement between the estates of Superman co-creators Joel Shuster and Jerry Siegel not to make further copyright deals with the studio. The documents also allegedly contain a formula for how the two estates will share proceeds on Superman once they successfully terminate Warner Bros.’ rights to the lucrative franchise.</span></p>
<h4><span> </span></h4>
<p><strong><span>Tattoo Law: </span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Flegalblogwatch.typepad.com%2Flegal_blog_watch%2F2011%2F05%2Ftattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFFkQ3W_lhQ-73eiXkDfz1k6BLFEg">Tattoo<br />
Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w"></a></span></p>
<p><span>A tattoo artist named Victor Whitmill is suing the producers of the film Hangover 2 for copyright infringement.<br />
The work in question is the tattoo Whitmill created on Mike Tyson’s face&#8230; it’s sort of a Maori Tribal art kind of thing&#8230; and frames Tyson’s left eye.</span></p>
<p><span> </span>Tyson appeared in the first movie&#8230; Hangover&#8230; and in the 2nd movie,  Ed Helms has  a duplicate tattoo on his face.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>GLEE plot leaks leads networks to consider NDA language for all contracts.</span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fglee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEbIt7YVQczUF8ttoz6UvJDKPxZLg">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/glee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867</a></span></p>
<p><span>An Extra on the successful musical series revealed the identity of the Prom King and Queen, and there was an uproar&#8230; Will day-players and stars alike now have to sign NDA&#8217;s?</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Kentucky Fight Song</span></strong></p>
<address><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGJpxd09x1OJy4GkR_09kQ343nrfQ">Court fight brews over use of University of Kentucky&#8217;s fight song | Latest Local, State News | Kentucky.com</a></span></address>
<p><span>Read more: </span><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F26%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html%23ixzz1M50pA7Nb&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHQhLUlp_oKOkfVvW5mdtOEsJhJig">http://www.kentucky.com/2011/04/26/1718804/court-fight-brews-over-use-of.html#ixzz1M50pA7Nb</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Compulsory Licenses:  the subject of debate by Artists</span></p>
<h4><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/QqziFEJaZhU/should-covering-songs-be-illegal-183759">Should Covering Songs Be Illegal? Dr. Luke, Ke$ha, Adam Lambert Weigh In</a></span></h4>
<p><span>After PRINCE very publicly denounced the provisions of copyright law that make covering songs possible with a<br />
compulsory license. (section 115). The  Hollywood Reporter asks others for their opinions.</span></p>
<p><strong><span> </span></strong><strong><span>Resource for our listeners </span><span>(hat-tip to bob Ambrogi)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span> </span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawsitesblog.com%2F2011%2F04%2Ffree-law-reporter-puts-searchable-opinions-online.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBjZomo49YAw4v3IxXMiSAKYi6kQ">‘Free Law Reporter’ Puts Searchable Opinions Online</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span>The searchable index of recent federal <span>and state court opinions was developed by the </span><span><a href="http://www.cali.org/">Center</a> </span><span><a href="http://www.cali.org/">for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction</a></span><span> (CALI). </span> It is  an “electronic case reporter” that makes the opinionsb searchable and also provides them as ebook collections. <span> </span></p>
<h2>Thanks</h2>
<div>
<p>If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a <strong>review</strong> in the iTunes store, and<strong> tell your friends</strong> and colleagues about the show.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.</h2>
</div>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/07916_zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 019 – Boop Boop Be Doo!</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Penguin Group Golan v. Holder Documentary/Reality and privacy rights Cariou v. Prince Betty Boop and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/cfab1_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow Ups</li>
<li>Penguin Group</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder</li>
<li>Documentary/Reality and privacy rights</li>
<li>Cariou v. Prince</li>
<li>Betty Boop</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/cfab1_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>Follow Ups</div>
<div><strong>Mass-Suing of Pirates Gets Shot In Arm Thanks to DC Judge</strong><br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403</a></div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Posting of Entire News Article is Fair Use, Says Judge in Righthaven</strong> Copyright Litigation :</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2011/03/articles/copyright/posting-of-entire-news-article-is-fair-use-says-judge-in-righthaven-copyright-litigation/">New Media and Technology Law Blog </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/">http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Supreme Court denies Eminem royalties hearing</strong><br />
Detroit Free Press: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9">http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9</a></p>
<p>In the wake of the FBT case&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Rick James Estate Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Universal Music Over Digital Revenue </strong><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323</a></p>
<p><strong>WGA, AMPTP agree on new contract</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164">http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164</a><br />
Jonathan Handel’s article: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325</a></p>
<p><strong>Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece </a></p>
<p>Opinion:  <a href="http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf">http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf</a></p>
<p>Supreme Court</p>
<p><strong>Golan v. Holder </strong>(questioning constitutionality of recapture of copyrights in foreign PD works)<br />
<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2011/03/supreme-court-to-hear-challenge-to-copyright-term-extension-act-with-regard-to-foreign-works-golan-v.html">Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Copyright Term Extension Act With Regard To Foreign Works (Golan v. Holder)</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm">Copyright Take-Backs? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Golan v. Holder</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/us/22bar.html?_r=2&amp;hp">Restoring Copyright to Public Domain Works &#8211; Adam Liptak &#8211; NYTimes.com</a><br />
Lexology:<a href="http://miniurl.org/7Mk"> http://miniurl.org/7Mk</a>,<a href="http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf"> http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
SUMMARY:<br />
The big question: Is Congress free to restore copyright protection to works that had entered the public domain and become public property?</p>
<p>QUICK TAKE</p>
<p><strong>Obama Administration &#8211; tough new laws for IP proposed</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hollywood-docket-obama-administration-proposes-168427">Hollywood Docket: Obama Administration Proposes Tough New IP Laws </a><br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming.ars">Obama &#8220;IP czar&#8221; wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming</a></p>
<p>The White House IP Enforcement Coordinator, Victoria Espinel, has published 20 legislative recommendations to Congress. Some of the relevant recommendations include:</p>
<p>1. Making infringement by streaming, or by means of other similar new technology, a felony. Currently, “reproducing” and “distributing” copyrighted works are felony charges but streaming, which seems more like a “public performance” is not a felony. This legislative change would impose felony charges on streaming pirated works.</p>
<p>2. Giving wiretap authority to the FBI and other federal agencies for intellectual property crimes, particularly criminal copyright and trademark cases.</p>
<p>3. Creating a public performance right for sound recordings transmitted by over-the-air broadcast stations. Currently, radio stations pay songwriters for the music they play but don’t have to pay the bands who recorded the material.</p>
<p><strong>Rights of privacy and publicity</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/cfab1_up-in-smoke-tour.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="154" /><strong>Mich. high court sides with Dr. Dre in spat over concert footage</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=24008">http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=24008</a><br />
Bowens v. Ary, Inc.  Mi. Supreme Court</p>
<p>SC: 140296 COA: 282711 Wayne CC: 02-233251-CZ<br />
No expectation of privacy when public official is executing the duties of his office.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Reality Show did not violate right of publicity of arrestee.</strong><br />
Best v. Berard  <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e28f0e79-6c37-4d0d-b9ce-d3d908b5586a">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e28f0e79-6c37-4d0d-b9ce-d3d908b5586a</a><br />
Decision: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/475bbbb">http://tinyurl.com/475bbbb</a></p>
<p>A state agency&#8217;s decision to award $1500 each to 23 black moviegoers at &#8220;Tyler Perry&#8217;s Why Did I Get Married?&#8221; is reversed.<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303</a><br />
Copyright and other cases<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303"></a><br />
<strong>Cariou v. Prince (Art Litigation)</strong><img class="alignright" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f090d_cariou-prince.jpg" alt="" width="229" height="159" /><br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince">http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince</a><br />
<a href="http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html">http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html</a><br />
<a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html</a></p>
<p>In this case, photographer Patrick Cariou claimed that “appropriation” artist Richard Prince infringed Cariou’s copyrighted photographs of Rastafarians in a series of collages and paintings created by Prince and sold by his art dealer (and co-defendant) the Gagosian Gallery.  Court finds AGAINST fair use.</p>
<p><strong>Betty Boop (*Fleischer  v. A.V.E.L.A.)</strong><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term="><strong><img class="alignright" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f090d_Betty-boop-opening-title.jpg" alt="" width="168" height="129" /></strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Fleischer Studios v. A.V.E.L.A. (Betty Boop case) (A.V.E.L.A = Art &amp; Vintage En<strong> </strong>tertainment Licensing Agency)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Lexology:</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2"> http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2</a><strong> </strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2"></a><br />
SUMMARY:<br />
Fleischer studios (merchandise licensor of Boop for use in toys, dolls, etc.) brought action against A.V.E.L.A. (competitor, licenses and uses Boop image on dolls, t-shirts and handbags) alleging copyright and TM infringement in the “Betty Boop” character.  A.V.E.L.A. moved for summary judgment (granted). Fleischer appealed district court’s ruling that Fleischer held neither a valid copyright nor a valid TM in the Betty Boop character. Ninth Circuit affirmed.<br />
Can Warner Bros. Stop Others From Using &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Characters?<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446"></a></p>
<p><strong>Bath &amp; Body Works v. Summit</strong> &#8211; dispute over “Twilight” line of toiletries<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019"></a></p>
<p>No Doubt you can sue!<br />
<strong>No Doubt v. Activision</strong> (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero)<br />
Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp"> http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp</a><br />
Westlaw:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8"> http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8</a></p>
<h4>Levi Strauss &amp; Co. v. Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Trading Co.</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=be1f96e9-1123-426f-a180-7d3c818c539e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=%20">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=be1f96e9-1123-426f-a180-7d3c818c539e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term= </a></p>
<p>This case involves trademark ownership of the stitch design on the back pocket of blue jeans. Specifically, Levi believes that the stitch used on the back pocket for Abercrombie &amp;Fitch blue jeans is too close in design to the stitch used on Levi’s blue jeans.</p>
<p><strong>Limewire damages</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=2157">http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=2157</a><br />
Damages order: <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/limewiredamagesorder.pdf">http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/limewiredamagesorder.pdf</a></p>
<p>If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a review in the iTunes store, and tell your friends and colleagues about the show.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.</h2>
</div>
<h6>Related articles</h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-handel/wga-ballots-on-the-way_b_845146.html">Jonathan Handel: WGA Ballots on the Way</a> (huffingtonpost.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/03/golan-holder-google-books.html">Will Golan v. Holder affect the Google Books settlement?</a> (radar.oreilly.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2011/04/01/copyright-2-0-show-episode-189/">Copyright 2.0 Show &#8211; Episode 189</a> (plagiarismtoday.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm">Copyright Take-Backs? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Golan v. Holder</a> (ericgoldman.org)</li>
</ul>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9afa1_zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special Edition: Jonathan Handel:  Hollywood On Strike</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: 310-243-6231 In this SPECIAL Episode: Jonathan Handel talks about the 2007-2009 Hollywood labor strife and his new book on the subject. BUY THE BOOK Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (print) Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age (kindle)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 385px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9f583_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<p><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span> </span></p>
<h2><strong><span>310-243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p><span>In this SPECIAL Episode:</span></p>
<p><span>Jonathan Handel talks about the 2007-2009 Hollywood labor strife and his new book on the subject.</span></p>
<h2><strong><em><span>BUY THE BOOK</span></em></strong></h2>
<p><strong><em><span><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/143823385X/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lawoffofgorpf-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=143823385X"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-729" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9f583_Image_-Hollywood-on-Strike_-An-Industry-at-War-in-the-Internet-Age-The-Writers-Guild-WGA-Strike-and-Screen-Actors-Guild-SAG-Stalemate-Entertainment-Labor-Unions_-Jonathan-Handel-201x300.png" alt="" width="121" height="180" /></a></span></em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/143823385X/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lawoffofgorpf-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=143823385X">Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age</a> (print)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004P8JWWK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=lawoffofgorpf-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B004P8JWWK">Hollywood on Strike!: An Industry at War in the Internet Age</a><img style="border: none !important;margin: 0px !important" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/858f0_ir?t=&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=B004P8JWWK" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> (kindle)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/special-edition-jonathan-handel-hollywood-on-strike-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 18 of beauty queens and footlong sandwiches</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 04:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Gaga / Madonna Tolkien estate vs. Book Author Subway Footlong trademark claims King&#8217;s Speech/No Animals Harmed Superbowl Class Action Medical Justice and DMCA for review sites Miss San Antonio de-throned, files suit and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. Entertainment Law Update...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0f2e0_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow Ups</li>
<li>Gaga / Madonna</li>
<li>Tolkien estate vs. Book Author</li>
<li>Subway Footlong trademark claims</li>
<li>King&#8217;s Speech/No Animals Harmed</li>
<li>Superbowl Class Action</li>
<li>Medical Justice and DMCA for review sites</li>
<li>Miss San Antonio de-throned, files suit</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p><div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0f2e0_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
</p>
<p><strong>Hendrix / Right of Publicity update &#8211; WA law is unconstitutional</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2011/02/when_it_comes_to_the_right_of.html">When It Comes to the Right of Publicity, Yes, Doubt :: Entertainment Law Blog</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=21f2ebbd-d80b-4fcc-b9b6-972f6179e4f5&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-02-18&amp;utm_term=">Washington State publicity law doesn&#8217;t law doesn&#8217;t extend to celebrities who die elsewhere &#8211; Lexology</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-showdown-future-celebrity-99473">Appeals Court Showdown Over Future of Celebrity Images &#8211; THR, Esq.</a><br />
Jimi Hendrix &#8211; Dead Celebrity Rights of Publicity Not Resurrected By Washington State Law</p>
<p><a href="http://marklitwak.blogspot.com/2011_02_01_archive.html#6966376710129543953">Entertainment Law Resources Blog:</a></p>
<p><a href="http://marklitwak.blogspot.com/2011_02_01_archive.html#6966376710129543953"></a><br />
<strong> Sheppard Fairey settled, but the case goes on.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://copyrightsandcampaigns.blogspot.com/2011/02/court-merchandising-of-shepard-fairey.html">Copyrights &amp; Campaigns: Court: Merchandising of Shepard Fairey &#8216;Obama Hope&#8217; image not fair use; factual issues remain on substantial similarity</a><br />
Anonymous Plaintiffs get to stay that way.<br />
11th Circuit: 2 girls in &#8216;Wild&#8217; video to remain anonymous<br />
<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=23847">http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=23847</a></p>
<p><strong>Hurt Locker Producers fight back</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/hurt-locker-producers-shoot-iraq-95216">Hurt Locker&#8217; Producers Shoot Back at Iraq War Veteran&#8217;s Lawsuit &#8211; THR, Esq.</a></p>
<p><strong>Righthaven Appealing Fair-Use Ruling in Copyright Infringement Case</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=7565&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=righthaven-media-bloggers-association-files-amicus-brief">Righthaven – Media Bloggers Association files amicus brief</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/15/righthaven-appealing-fair-use-ruling-copyright-cas/">Righthaven appealing fair-use ruling in copyright infringement case</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/16/matt-drudge-settles-righthave-copyright-lawsuit-ou/">http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/16/matt-drudge-settles-righthave-copyright-lawsuit-ou/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/15/righthaven-appealing-fair-use-ruling-copyright-cas/">http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/15/righthaven-appealing-fair-use-ruling-copyright-cas/</a></p>
<h2><a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/feb/15/righthaven-appealing-fair-use-ruling-copyright-cas/"></a><br />
Cases and Controversies</h2>
<p><strong>Gaga “Born this Way” and Madonna “Express Yourself” Infringement, Permission?<br />
</strong> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lady-gagas-born-way-is-99037">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lady-gagas-born-way-is-99037</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/02/12/madonna-lady-gaga-express-yourself-born-this-way/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/02/12/madonna-lady-gaga-express-yourself-born-this-way/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lady-gaga-madonna-approves-born-99711">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lady-gaga-madonna-approves-born-99711</a><br />
<a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/marc_malkin/b226590_lady_gaga_did_madonna_really_eggspress.html">http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/marc_malkin/b226590_lady_gaga_did_madonna_really_eggspress.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/02/12/madonna-lady-gaga-express-yourself-born-this-way/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/02/12/madonna-lady-gaga-express-yourself-born-this-way/</a><br />
You can listen to the YouTube Mashup Here<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUDSX9vyG20&amp;NR=1">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUDSX9vyG20&amp;NR=1</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20110212/en_ac/7842484_lady_gagas_born_this_way_a_ripoff_of_madonnas_express_yourself_1">Lady Gaga&#8217;s &#8220;Born This Way&#8221; a Rip-Off of Madonna&#8217;s &#8220;Express …</a><br />
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2011/02/14/exp.hln.gaga.egg.designer_1.cnn?iref=allsearch">CNN: Did Gaga copy Madonna ? </a><br />
Pop sensation Lady Gaga latest album is about to “drop” and some say her newest single “Born with Way” bears a striking auditory resemblance to Madonna’s 80s hit “Express Yourself.” Although Lady Gaga’s has been accused of stealing from the Madonna’s style playbook</p>
<p><strong>Tolkien Estate objects to book with Tolkien as a character.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/jrr-tolkien-estate-threatens-lawsuit-101528">JRR Tolkien Estate Threatens Lawsuit Over Book Featuring Tolkien As Character (Exclusive) &#8211; THR, Esq.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://law.onecle.com/texas/property/chapter26.html">Texas Right of Publicity Statute &#8212; Texas Property Code Chapter 26</a></p>
<p>The estate of J.R.R. Tolkien is attempting to prevent an author from publishing a book in which the  “Lord of the Rings” and “Hobbit” author is a character.<br />
<strong> Can Subway register “footlong” as a trademark?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=7556&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=footlong-trademark-thing">Footlong trademark thing</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.duetsblog.com/uploads/file/FootlongSubComplaint.pdf">http://www.duetsblog.com/uploads/file/FootlongSubComplaint.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77752328">http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=77752328</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=7556&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=footlong-trademark-thing"></a></p>
<p>The corporation that owns  sandwich chain Subway sent Casey’s General Store, Inc., a cease-and-desist letter to stop using the word “footlong” in connection with “footlong submarine sandwich,” claiming the word is trademarked. Casey’s General Store filed a declaratory judgement action in Iowa federal court seeking a ruling that the word “footlong” is a generic word and not unique to Subway.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/kings-speech-threatened-legal-action-96849"><strong>&#8216;The King&#8217;s Speech&#8217; Threatened With Legal Action Over &#8216;No Animals Harmed&#8217; Claim (Updated) &#8211; THR, Esq.</strong></a><br />
The American Humane Association threatened the Weinstein Co. with legal action over the use of the phrase “no animals were harmed” contained in the credits of 2011 Best Picture winner “The King’s Speech.”</p>
<p><strong>NFL’s Attempt to Settle with Angry Fans</strong><br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576134183227741352.html">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704858404576134183227741352.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/super-bowl/local/20110215-nfl-improves-offer-to-super-bowl-ticket-holders-without-seats.ece">http://www.dallasnews.com/sports/super-bowl/local/20110215-nfl-improves-offer-to-super-bowl-ticket-holders-without-seats.ece</a><br />
<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2284672/">http://www.slate.com/id/2284672/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=f53ef809-53dd-4d3b-8a30-173f692cd34c">awsuit filed in Federal Court for the Northern District of Texas</a></p>
<p>A class-action suit has been filed by ticket-holders denied seating at the 2011 Super Bowl game.</p>
<p><strong>Is copyright law being misused to limit patients’ reviews of doctors and dentists?<br />
</strong> <a href="http://www.ericgoldman.org/Speeches/houstonmedicaljustice.pdf">http://www.ericgoldman.org/Speeches/houstonmedicaljustice.pdf</a></p>
<p>Professor Eric Goldman  (Santa Clara University) in a recent speech, raised some real questions about the recent approach of an outfit called “Medical Justice”, which helps doctors and dentists manage their legal liability, and now to control negative consumer reviews.</p>
<p>Does this violate Medical Ethics? (putting Doctor’s financial interests ahead of patient interests)<br />
What’s next?  Should lawyers follow suit in our fee agreements?<br />
Restaurants?<br />
What about Broadway’s recent issue with reviewers ignoring protocol and reviewing Spiderman while it’s still in Previews?  Could we make preview tickets subject to such a clause?</p>
<p><strong>Miss San Antonio Beauty Queen Dispute</strong><br />
Lorena Briseno, as next of friend of Domonique Ramirez v. The Miss Bexar County Organization Inc., 288th District Court, Bexar County, Texas.<br />
<a href="http://texaslawyer.typepad.com/texas_lawyer_blog/2011/02/hearing-set-for-wednesday-in-beauty-queen-battle.html">http://texaslawyer.typepad.com/texas_lawyer_blog/2011/02/hearing-set-for-wednesday-in-beauty-queen-battle.html</a><br />
<a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:VG1APbknSRMJ:pdfserver.amlaw.com/tx/ramirez_petition.pdf+Lorena+Briseno,+as+next+of+friend+of+Domonique+Ramirez+v.+The+Miss+Bexar+County+Organization+Inc.&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjDGUpdznBJjzajCWMyQr4G2Jz2VTpEBWy6lclkF39MSpdQ69xj4bmy85z8-CzYhErEsMzctgctsLX8274vapIX5zdwAjiJDDmfBqAQNldfo9Pixt_CcatihJcY6rJbTWIjZnL-&amp;sig=AHIEtbQsLQQGk2NDTQYCG662Qwuolms0uA">http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:VG1APbknSRMJ:pdfserver.amlaw.com/tx/ramirez_petition.pdf+Lorena+Briseno,+as+next+of+friend+of+Domonique+Ramirez+v.+The+Miss+Bexar+County+Organization+Inc.&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjDGUpdznBJjzajCWMyQr4G2Jz2VTpEBWy6lclkF39MSpdQ69xj4bmy85z8-CzYhErEsMzctgctsLX8274vapIX5zdwAjiJDDmfBqAQNldfo9Pixt_CcatihJcY6rJbTWIjZnL-&amp;sig=AHIEtbQsLQQGk2NDTQYCG662Qwuolms0uA</a><br />
<a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;q=cache:VG1APbknSRMJ:pdfserver.amlaw.com/tx/ramirez_petition.pdf+Lorena+Briseno,+as+next+of+friend+of+Domonique+Ramirez+v.+The+Miss+Bexar+County+Organization+Inc.&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us&amp;pid=bl&amp;srcid=ADGEESjDGUpdznBJjzajCWMyQr4G2Jz2VTpEBWy6lclkF39MSpdQ69xj4bmy85z8-CzYhErEsMzctgctsLX8274vapIX5zdwAjiJDDmfBqAQNldfo9Pixt_CcatihJcY6rJbTWIjZnL-&amp;sig=AHIEtbQsLQQGk2NDTQYCG662Qwuolms0uA"></a><br />
Local news clip, Ramirez is interviewed after losing the crown in the February 16th hearing.<br />
<a href="http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2011/02/former-miss-san-antonio-still-fighting-for-her-crown.html">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2011/02/former-miss-san-antonio-still-fighting-for-her-crown.html</a><br />
What ever happened to the Statute of Limitations?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/cbs-sued-63-year-old-97091"><strong>CBS Sued Over 63-Year-Old Song Used in &#8216;Family Ties&#8217; &#8211; THR, Esq.</strong></a></p>
<p>This case involves the unauthorized use of a song for a TV show from March 28, 1985. The show was “Family Ties,” and the particular episode in question used the song “We’re the Men of Texaco,” the theme song to Milton Berle’s 1940s variety show “Texaco Star Theatre.”</p>
<p><strong>Maid Sues Best Selling Author  of “The Help”</strong><br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/lawsuit-black-maid-ablene-cooper-sues-author-kathryn/story?id=12968562">Black Maid Sues, Says &#8216;The Help&#8217; is Humiliating</a><br />
<a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/best-selling_author_of_the_help_is_sued_by_family_maid/">Best-Selling Author of &#8216;The Help&#8217; Is Sued by Family Maid re &#8230;</a><br />
<a href="http://news.findlaw.com/ap_stories/e/1404/02-17-2011/20110217102001_23.html">http://news.findlaw.com/ap_stories/e/1404/02-17-2011/20110217102001_23.html</a></p>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/120ff_zemified_e.png?x-id=c0324316-7f87-4c43-aba4-1b23c06b93c1" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/12/episode-18-of-beauty-queens-and-footlong-sandwiches-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 025 &#8211; What&#8217;s with all the Zombies?</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Zombie Righthaven Golan v. Holder at the USSC Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity? ReDigi &#8211; digital music first sale doctrine? Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement Costumes and copyright? and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Zombie Righthaven</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder at the USSC</li>
<li>Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?</li>
<li>ReDigi &#8211; digital music first sale doctrine?</li>
<li>Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement</li>
<li>Costumes and copyright?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-209"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>
<h3 dir="ltr">FOLLOW &#8211; UPS</h3>
<p><strong>Righthaven &#8212; almost dead, but not quite</strong><br />
Vegas Inc.: <a href="http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/">http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/</a></p>
<p><strong>Hollywood eyes fate of copyright law (Golan v. Holder update)</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528</a></p>
<p>Link to mp3 of the entire oral argument:<a href="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545"> http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545</a></p>
<p><strong>Public Domain Info Project</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pdinfo.com/">http://www.pdinfo.com/ </a></p>
<p><strong>Middle Tennessee State University Center for Popular Music:</strong><br />
<a href="http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/">http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/</a></p>
<p><strong>Monroe Publicity Rights </strong><br />
Law360: <a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881?nl_pk=26cb3b47-8864-4d65-9661-d1383057df81&amp;utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881</a></p>
<p><strong>George Clinton dispute regarding digital downloads.</strong><br />
<a href="http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/">http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/</a></p>
<p><strong>ReDigi &#8211; can you legally resell your music?</strong><br />
TechCrunch: <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/</a></p>
<p><strong>Does Warner Bros. Really Have Exclusive Movie Rights to a Story Posted on Reddit?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726</a><br />
<strong>Can MTV Sue New Jersey For Nixing &#8216;Jersey Shore&#8217; Tax Credit?</strong><br />
NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html</a><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609</a><br />
NJ.com: <a href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html">http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html</a></p>
<p><strong>80’s Hair Band Poison sued for allegedly stealing songs twenty-five years ago</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story">http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story</a></p>
<p><strong>Could Ben Affleck be liable for The Town-inspired robberies?</strong><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/10/can-ben-affleck-be-liable-for-the-town-nyc-robberies.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">http://blogs.findlaw.com</a><br />
FindLaw: <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html">http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html</a></p>
<p><strong>Power Rangers Halloween Costumes &#8211; Can They Be Copyrighted?</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742</a></p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Hurt Locker&#8217; Case Dismissed on Anti-Slapp motion</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter</a><br />
Casp.net: <a href="http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/">http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/</a></p>
<p><strong>Man claims that The Hangover II was based on his life story</strong><br />
THR: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303</a></p>
<p><strong>Quarterback’s suit against EA dismissed</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=01d5c62d-8f1b-4596-a958-2600b5efc96f&amp;utm_source=lexology+daily+newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=html+email+-+body+-+federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=lexology+daily+newsfeed+2011-10-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com</a></p>
<p><strong>Actress Sues iMDB for revealing age</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-whats-with-all-the-zombies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpsiode025mp3.mp3" length="59643571" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Zombie Righthaven   Golan v. Holder at the USSC   Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?   ReDigi - digital music first sale doctrine?   Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Zombie Righthaven
	Golan v. Holder at the USSC
	Marilyn Monroe Right of Publicity?
	ReDigi - digital music first sale doctrine?
	Poison gets sued 25 years after infringement
	Costumes and copyright?
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

 
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes

FOLLOW - UPS
Righthaven -- almost dead, but not quite
Vegas Inc.: http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/oct/21/another-judge-doubtful-righthavens-standing-sue/

Hollywood eyes fate of copyright law (Golan v. Holder update)
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-argument-copyright-public-domain-244528

Link to mp3 of the entire oral argument: http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_545

Public Domain Info Project
http://www.pdinfo.com/ 

Middle Tennessee State University Center for Popular Music:
http://popmusic.mtsu.edu/

Monroe Publicity Rights 
Law360: http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/276881

George Clinton dispute regarding digital downloads.
http://ipandentertainmentlaw.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/george-clinton-v-umg-royalty-disptues-and-more/

ReDigi - can you legally resell your music?
TechCrunch: http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/14/what-if-you-could-legally-resell-your-digital-music-redigi-may-have-found-the-solution/

Does Warner Bros. Really Have Exclusive Movie Rights to a Story Posted on Reddit?
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/does-warner-bros-have-movie-250726
Can MTV Sue New Jersey For Nixing &#039;Jersey Shore&#039; Tax Credit?
NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/nyregion/christie-blocks-tax-credit-for-jersey-shore.html
THR: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/can-mtv-sue-new-jersey-shore-241609
NJ.com: http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/09/gov_christie_vetoes_jersey_sho.html

80’s Hair Band Poison sued for allegedly stealing songs twenty-five years ago
http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/legal-and-management/hair-band-war-did-poison-steal-80s-hits-1005429832.story

Could Ben Affleck be liable for The Town-inspired robberies?
FindLaw: http://blogs.findlaw.com
FindLaw: http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20030602.html

Power Rangers Halloween Costumes - Can They Be Copyrighted?
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/power-rangers-halloween-costumes-morph-254742

&#039;Hurt Locker&#039; Case Dismissed on Anti-Slapp motion
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/read-judges-decision-hurt-locker-248276?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter
Casp.net: http://www.casp.net/california-anti-slapp-first-amendment-law-resources/statutes/

Man claims that The Hangover II was based on his life story
THR: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/man-sues-claiming-hangover-ii-249303

Quarterback’s suit against EA dismissed
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com

Actress Sues iMDB for revealing age
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/actress-sued-imdb-identity-250664</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 025 – What’s with all the Zombies?</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment&#8230; To listen to this episode, please visit our webpage or subscribe in iTunes or the Android Podcast directory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monthly roundup of entertainment law news and case briefs from Entertainment&#8230;</p>
<p>To listen to this episode, please visit our webpage or subscribe in iTunes or the Android Podcast directory.
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=BlsqNJ7zoVY:S7HWnghv7Ps:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/3286a_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=BlsqNJ7zoVY:S7HWnghv7Ps:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d7f1d_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=BlsqNJ7zoVY:S7HWnghv7Ps:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=BlsqNJ7zoVY:S7HWnghv7Ps:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d7f1d_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d7f1d_BlsqNJ7zoVY" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/10/episode-025-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-with-all-the-zombies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast Episode 024</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-024/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-024/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more $10 infringement settlements Tenenbaum award reinstated Indies sue Limewire Betty Boop ruling revised Material Girl trademark suit proceeds You can&#8217;t copyright food GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more</li>
<li>$10 infringement settlements</li>
<li>Tenenbaum award reinstated</li>
<li>Indies sue Limewire</li>
<li>Betty Boop ruling revised</li>
<li>Material Girl trademark suit proceeds</li>
<li>You can&#8217;t copyright food</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a> </span></strong><em></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-205"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>The end of Righthaven?</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Wired: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">www</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">wired</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">threatlevel</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medianews</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">dumb</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">idea</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/?</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">ArsTechnica: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">http</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">://</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">arstechnica</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">com</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tech</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">policy</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">news</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">righthaven</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">copyright</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">suits</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">tossed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">in</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">colorado</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">-</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">too</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">.</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">ars</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">?</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">campaign</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">rss</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">source</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitterfeed</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">&amp;</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">utm</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">_</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">medium</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">=</a><a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">twitter</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Law firm offers $10 settlements to music copyright infringers</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT"> PaidContent: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">http</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">://</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">paidcontent</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">.</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">org</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">article</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/419-10-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">settlement</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">offers</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">the</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">entertainment</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">industrys</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">new</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">copyright</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">-</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">tactic</a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong>Court Upholds $675 Judgment Against Joel Tenenbaum</strong></p>
<p>FindLaw: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">http</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">://</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">blogs</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">findlaw</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">com</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">first</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">_</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">circuit</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">reinstates</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-675000-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">judgment</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">against</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">joel</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">-</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">tenenbaum</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">.</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">html</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">?=</a><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features">features</a></span></span></p>
<p>Goldman blog: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">http</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">://</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">blog</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">ericgoldman</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">org</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">archives</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">/2011/09/1</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">st</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">circuit</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">_</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">rei</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">.</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm">htm</a></span></span></p>
<p>Order: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">http</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">://</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docs</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">docstoc</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">com</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">/29137/470628</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">6-</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">a</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">507-41</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">ce</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-8</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">cbd</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">-0309210</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">c</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">748</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">e</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">.</a><a href="http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>Independent Labels Sue LimeWire for their Share of Settlement</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">/695</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy">vmhy</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Saregama</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">v</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Timbaland</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">, </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">et</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">al</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">.</a></strong></span></span><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Case</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">No</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">. 10-10626 (11</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">th</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">Cir</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">., </a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf">March</a><a href="http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/201010626.pdf"> 25, 2011)?</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><strong>2nd Cir. Will Hear Richard Prince’s Photo Use Appeal</strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Law360: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">http</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">://</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">www</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">law</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">360.</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">com</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">ip</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">articles</a><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962">/271962</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">NYTimes: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">http</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">://</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">artsbeat</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">blogs</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">nytimes</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">.</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">com</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/2011/09/15/</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">court</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">allows</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">richard</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">prince</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">to</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">appeal</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">copyright</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">-</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">decision</a><a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/">/</a></span></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Betty Boop no longer threat to Detroit Lions, Princeton Tigers, or Yogi Bear — oh my!</span></strong></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">ttgb</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">2</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y">y</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Opinion: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">http</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">://</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">www</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">ca</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">9.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">uscourts</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">gov</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">datastore</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">opinions</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">/2011/08/19/09-56317.</a><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ca9.uscourts.gov%2Fdatastore%2Fopinions%2F2011%2F08%2F19%2F09-56317.pdf&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNF-lSCruJ5bcJUIVHwakI38o5ushQ">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> &#8217;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold; font-size: x-small;">Cause we are living in a material world! But it doesn&#8217;t belong to Madonna!</span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">http</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">://</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">www</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">com</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">library</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">/</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">detail</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">.</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">aspx</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">?</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">g</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">6</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">58</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">d</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">7</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">c</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-83</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">ae</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">-45</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">3-</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">a</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">353-32</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">f</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">5</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">fa</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">48741</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">e</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">source</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">medium</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">HTML</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">email</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Body</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+-+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Federal</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">section</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">campaign</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">subscriber</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">feed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">content</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Lexology</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Daily</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">Newsfeed</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">+2011-09-20&amp;</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">utm</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">_</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">term</a><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=">=</a></span></span></p>
<p>THREsq: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">http</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">://</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">www</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">hollywoodreporter</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">.</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">com</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">thr</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">esq</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">/</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">judge</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">rejects</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">madonnas</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">trademark</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">claim</a><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562">-231562</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h1><span style="font-size: x-small;">Ninth Circuit adopts lower court’s use of its own &#8220;blades of chaos&#8221; to filter out the unprotectable elements of a plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim</span></h1>
<p align="LEFT">Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">yv</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">68</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl">kl</a></span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>You can&#8217;t copyright a bowl of food</strong></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"> KIM SENG COMPANY v J&amp;A IMPORTERS, INC., ET AL.</p>
<p align="LEFT"> Lexology: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">/3</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh">hgcagh</a></span></span></p>
<p align="LEFT">Decision: <a href="http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf"><span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf</span></span></a></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="color: #3e3d40;">Cases mentioned:</span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Feist</a> <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Publ</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">&#8216;</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">ns</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Rural</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Tel</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Serv</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">., 499 </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">U</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">.</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">S</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1195336269698056315&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. 340, 361 (1991)</a></span>.</p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Satava</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10760822199156739379&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lowry</a></span></p>
<p align="LEFT"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lamps</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Plus</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">, </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Inc</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">v</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">. </a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Seattle</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Lighting</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Fixture</a><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10008823426294558731&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=2,22&amp;as_vis=1">Co</a></span>. I</p>
<h4 align="CENTER">Quick-Takes</h4>
<p><strong>EU Adds 20 years to Music Copyrights</strong></p>
<p>Ars: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">http</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">://</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">tinyurl</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">.</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">com</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">/4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">y</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">4</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz">lojz</a></span></span></p>
<p>EU Directive: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">https</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">://</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">www</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">consilium</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">europa</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">eu</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">uedocs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">cms</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">_</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">data</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">docs</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pressdata</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">en</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">intm</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">/124570.</a><a href="https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf">pdf</a></span></span></p>
<h4 align="CENTER">New Filings</h4>
<p><strong>Deadline’s Parent Company Sues THR’s Parent Company for Copyright Infringement</strong></p>
<p>LA Times: <span style="color: #000099;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">http</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">://</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimesblogs</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">latimes</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">com</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">entertainmentnewsbuzz</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">/2011/09/</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">deadline</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">hollywood</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">reporter</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">-</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">lawsuit</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">.</a><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html">html</a></span></span></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=23a81528-f24d-4e60-a6c0-6596b7ad5fe8" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode024.mp3" length="64003963" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Righthaven is wrong... even more   $10 infringement settlements   Tenenbaum award reinstated   Indies sue Limewire   Betty Boop ruling revised   Material Girl trademark suit proceeds </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Righthaven is wrong... even more
	$10 infringement settlements
	Tenenbaum award reinstated
	Indies sue Limewire
	Betty Boop ruling revised
	Material Girl trademark suit proceeds
	You can&#039;t copyright food

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

 
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
The end of Righthaven?
Wired: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/medianews-righthaven-dumb-idea/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter
ArsTechnica: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/09/righthaven-copyright-suits-tossed-in-colorado-too.ars?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=rss&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter
Law firm offers $10 settlements to music copyright infringers
 PaidContent: http://paidcontent.org/article/419-10-settlement-offers-the-entertainment-industrys-new-copyright-tactic/
Court Upholds $675 Judgment Against Joel Tenenbaum

FindLaw: http://blogs.findlaw.com/first_circuit/2011/09/circuit-reinstates-675000-judgment-against-joel-tenenbaum.html?=features

Goldman blog: http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/09/1st_circuit_rei.htm

Order: http://docs.docstoc.com/pdf/29137/470628a6-a507-41ce-8cbd-0309210c748e.pdf
Independent Labels Sue LimeWire for their Share of Settlement
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/695vmhy
Saregamav. Timbaland, etal.CaseNo. 10-10626 (11thCir., March 25, 2011)?
2nd Cir. Will Hear Richard Prince’s Photo Use Appeal
Law360: http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/271962
NYTimes: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/15/court-allows-richard-prince-to-appeal-copyright-decision/
Betty Boop no longer threat to Detroit Lions, Princeton Tigers, or Yogi Bear — oh my!
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3ttgb2y
Opinion: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/08/19/09-56317.pdf
 &#039;Cause we are living in a material world! But it doesn&#039;t belong to Madonna!
Lexology: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e6c58d7c-83ae-45a3-a353-32f5fa48741e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-09-20&amp;utm_term=
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-rejects-madonnas-trademark-claim-231562

 
Ninth Circuit adopts lower court’s use of its own &quot;blades of chaos&quot; to filter out the unprotectable elements of a plaintiff’s copyright infringement claim
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/4yv68kl
 
You can&#039;t copyright a bowl of food
 KIM SENG COMPANY v J&amp;A IMPORTERS, INC., ET AL.
 Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3hgcagh
Decision: http://iplawwatch.foxrothschild.com/uploads/file/seng742.pdf
Cases mentioned:
Feist Publ&#039;ns, Inc. v. RuralTel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 (1991).
Satavav. Lowry
LampsPlus, Inc. v. SeattleLightingFixtureCo. I

Quick-Takes
EU Adds 20 years to Music Copyrights

Ars: http://tinyurl.com/4y4lojz

EU Directive: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/intm/124570.pdf
New Filings
Deadline’s Parent Company Sues THR’s Parent Company for Copyright Infringement

LA Times: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/deadline-hollywood-reporter-lawsuit.html</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 024 – Wronghaven, Immaterial Girls &amp; Noodle Bowls</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more $10 infringement&#8230; To listen to this episode, please visit our webpage or subscribe in iTunes or the Android Podcast directory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this Episode:</p>
<p>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; even more<br />
$10 infringement&#8230;</p>
<p>To listen to this episode, please visit our webpage or subscribe in iTunes or the Android Podcast directory.
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=jcWXfY7n2b8:EQls60CSUZk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/c4c35_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=jcWXfY7n2b8:EQls60CSUZk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/c4c35_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=jcWXfY7n2b8:EQls60CSUZk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=jcWXfY7n2b8:EQls60CSUZk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70dd6_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70dd6_jcWXfY7n2b8" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/09/episode-024-%e2%80%93-wronghaven-immaterial-girls-noodle-bowls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ELU Episode 023 – Monkeying Around with Copyright Law</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;. Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict Wizard of Oz film characters still protected First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods Monkeying around with copyright and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDITf or this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/6c391_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;.</li>
<li>Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict</li>
<li>Wizard of Oz film characters still protected</li>
<li>First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods</li>
<li>Monkeying around with copyright</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em></em>f or this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/6c391_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span>Follow Ups</span></p>
<div><strong>Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok">http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a>The cases in question:
</div>
<div>Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);</p>
<p>Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).</p>
<p><a href="http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2011/04/15/rhavenstrategicalliance.pdf">Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement.</a></p>
<p><strong>Disney Appeals $319 Million &#8216;Millionaire&#8217; Verdict</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538</a></p>
<p><strong>Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">=====================</p>
<h4>Feature Stories</h4>
<p><strong>Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255</a><br />
Link to decision:<a href="http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR"> http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR</a></p>
<p>If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.</p>
<p><a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/188/239/case.html">Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company</a>, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the<br />
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright"> copyright. </a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters:</strong><a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/"> http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/62481366/John-Wiley-amp-Sons-v-Kirtsaeng#fullscreen:on">John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896.</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Mine o&#8217; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese</strong></p>
<p>Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz"> http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz</a><br />
Decision:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt"> http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt</a></p>
<h4>Quick Takes</h4>
<p><strong>Jury Sides With DreamWorks Animation in &#8216;Kung Fu Panda&#8217; Case</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019</a></p>
<p><strong>Project Runway Hit With Copyright Lawsuit from Photographer</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618</a></p>
<p><strong>The Wild Lawsuit Against Bravo&#8217;s &#8216;Million Dollar Decorators&#8217;</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179</a></p>
<p><strong>Copyright for All Primates?</strong><br />
Nearby Café:<a href="http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129"> http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129</a><br />
Art Info:<a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/"> http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/</a></p>
<p><strong>Real World Sued For Failing to Blur Shadow Dancers</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947</a></p>
<p><strong>A Village Person Test The Copyright Law</strong><br />
NYTimes:<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1"> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1</a></p>
<p><strong>Marlon Brando Estate Sues Over &#8216;Brando&#8217; Sofas</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596</a></p>
<p>NEW US CODE SEARCH TOOL  <a href="http://uscodebeta.house.gov/">http://uscodebeta.house.gov/</a></p>
<p>THE FAIR USE CALCULATOR AT <a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">HTTP</a><a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">://librarycopyright.net/fairuse </a></p>
<h4>not legal advice, but a useful tool to document your arguments on the 4 factors&#8230;.</h4>
</div>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=JDPf2DdHlw8:YDtdBCzOb8g:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/6c391_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=JDPf2DdHlw8:YDtdBCzOb8g:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/40713_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=JDPf2DdHlw8:YDtdBCzOb8g:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=JDPf2DdHlw8:YDtdBCzOb8g:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/40713_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/40713_JDPf2DdHlw8" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/elu-episode-023-%e2%80%93-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update 023 &#8211; monkeying around with copyright law</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/entertainment-law-update-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/entertainment-law-update-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;. Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict Wizard of Oz film characters still protected First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods Monkeying around with copyright and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDITf or this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Righthaven is wrong&#8230; again, and again, and again&#8230;.</li>
<li>Disney Appeals  &#8221;Millionaire&#8221; verdict</li>
<li>Wizard of Oz film characters still protected</li>
<li>First Sale doesn&#8217;t apply to imported goods</li>
<li>Monkeying around with copyright</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em></em>f or this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-199"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">Follow Ups</span></p>
<div><strong>Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week</strong><br />
Lexology: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok">http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2ok</a>The cases in question:</div>
<div>Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).</p>
<p><a href="http://media.lasvegassun.com/media/pdfs/blogs/documents/2011/04/15/rhavenstrategicalliance.pdf">Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement.</a></p>
<p><strong>Disney Appeals $319 Million &#8216;Millionaire&#8217; Verdict</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538</a></p>
<p><strong>Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151</a></p>
</div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">=====================</p>
<h4 dir="ltr">Feature Stories</h4>
<p><strong>Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Remakes</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255</a><br />
Link to decision:<a href="http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR"> http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR</a></p>
<p>If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.</p>
<p><a href="http://supreme.justia.com/us/188/239/case.html">Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company</a>, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the<br />
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright"> copyright. </a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters:</strong><a href="http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/"> http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/62481366/John-Wiley-amp-Sons-v-Kirtsaeng#fullscreen:on">John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896.</a></p>
<p dir="ltr"><strong>Mine o&#8217; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese</strong></p>
<p>Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz"> http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz</a><br />
Decision:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt"> http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt</a></p>
<h4 style="text-align: center;" dir="ltr">Quick Takes</h4>
<p><strong>Jury Sides With DreamWorks Animation in &#8216;Kung Fu Panda&#8217; Case</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019</a></p>
<p><strong>Project Runway Hit With Copyright Lawsuit from Photographer</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618</a></p>
<p><strong>The Wild Lawsuit Against Bravo&#8217;s &#8216;Million Dollar Decorators&#8217;</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179</a></p>
<p><strong>Copyright for All Primates?</strong><br />
Nearby Café:<a href="http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129"> http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129</a><br />
Art Info:<a href="http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/"> http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/</a></p>
<p><strong>Real World Sued For Failing to Blur Shadow Dancers</strong><br />
THREsq: <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947</a></p>
<p><strong>A Village Person Test The Copyright Law</strong><br />
NYTimes:<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1"> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1</a></p>
<p><strong>Marlon Brando Estate Sues Over &#8216;Brando&#8217; Sofas</strong><br />
THREsq:<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596"> http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596</a></p>
<p>NEW US CODE SEARCH TOOL  <a href="http://uscodebeta.house.gov/">http://uscodebeta.house.gov/</a></p>
<p>THE FAIR USE CALCULATOR AT <a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">HTTP</a><a href="http://librarycopyright.net/fairuse">://librarycopyright.net/fairuse </a></p>
<h4 dir="ltr">not legal advice, but a useful tool to document your arguments on the 4 factors&#8230;.</h4>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/08/entertainment-law-update-023-monkeying-around-with-copyright-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode023.mp3" length="72256156" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Righthaven is wrong... again, and again, and again....   Disney Appeals  &quot;Millionaire&quot; verdict   Wizard of Oz film characters still protected   First Sale doesn&#039;t apply to imported goods </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Righthaven is wrong... again, and again, and again....
	Disney Appeals  &quot;Millionaire&quot; verdict
	Wizard of Oz film characters still protected
	First Sale doesn&#039;t apply to imported goods
	Monkeying around with copyright
	and more...

GET CLE CREDITf or this episode.

 
Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Follow Ups

Righthaven suffers three strikes in one week
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3e8m2okThe cases in question:
Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC, 2011 WL 2378186 (D. Nev. June 14, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.);Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, 2011 WL 2441020 (D. Nev. June 20, 2011) (Philip M. Pro, J.);Righthaven LLC v. DiBiase, Case No. 2:10-cv-01343-RLH-PAL, Order (D. Nev. June 22, 2011) (Roger L. Hunt, C.J.).

Link to Strategic Alliance Agreement.

Disney Appeals $319 Million &#039;Millionaire&#039; Verdict
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/disney-appeals-319-mil-millionaire-216538

Jack Kirby appeals loss in Marvel copyright lawsuit
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-vows-appeal-216642
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jack-kirby-estate-files-appeal-223151



=====================

Feature Stories
Warner Bros. Wins Key Legal Ruling Impacting All &#039;Wizard of Oz&#039; Remakes
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-wins-key-legal-208255
Link to decision: http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=In%20FCO%2020110705129.xml&amp;docbase=CSLWAR3-2007-CURR

If you’re interested in reading the entire decision, the case is called Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. v.  X One X Productions.

Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Company, 188 U.S. 239 (1903), is a case in which the
U.S. Supreme Court found that advertisements were protected by copyright. 
Copyright owners win broader rights for works made abroad Thompson Reuters: http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.com/Legal/News/2011/08_-_August/Copyright_owners_win_broader_rights_for_works_made_abroad_-court/
John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc v. Supap Kirtsaeng d/b/a Bluechristine99, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, No. 09-4896.
Mine o&#039; Mine, Inc. v. Calmese
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/3vydpzz
Decision: http://tinyurl.com/3mkx9qt
Quick Takes
Jury Sides With DreamWorks Animation in &#039;Kung Fu Panda&#039; Case
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/jury-sides-dreamworks-animation-kung-215019

Project Runway Hit With Copyright Lawsuit from Photographer
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/project-runway-hit-copyright-lawsuit-217618

The Wild Lawsuit Against Bravo&#039;s &#039;Million Dollar Decorators&#039;
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/wild-lawsuit-bravos-million-dollar-216179

Copyright for All Primates?
Nearby Café: http://nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/?p=8129
Art Info: http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/38113/could-the-cindy-sherman-of-monkeys-accidentally-revolutionize-copyright-law-for-artists/

Real World Sued For Failing to Blur Shadow Dancers
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/real-world-sued-failing-blur-220947

A Village Person Test The Copyright Law
NYTimes: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/arts/music/village-people-singer-claims-rights-to-ymca.html?_r=1

Marlon Brando Estate Sues Over &#039;Brando&#039; Sofas
THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-brando-223596

NEW US CODE SEARCH TOOL  http://uscodebeta.house.gov/

THE FAIR USE CALCULATOR AT HTTP://librarycopyright.net/fairuse 
not legal advice,</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 22 – Violent Games, (anti) Slapps and other painless fun</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Hangover Tattoo case settled Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot California Video Game Law unconstitutional You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hangover Tattoo case settled</li>
<li>Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot</li>
<li>California Video Game Law unconstitutional</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.</li>
<li>Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes<!-- ol{margin:0;padding:0}p{margin:0}.c9{width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c6{color:#000099;font-size:14pt;font-weight:bold}.c2{font-size:14pt;font-family:Georgia}.c7{color:#333333;font-family:Trebuchet MS}.c1{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c3{color:#454545;font-family:Georgia}.c16{background-color:#ea9999}.c8{text-align:center}.c18{color:#454545}.c10{color:#000099}.c12{font-weight:bold}.c11{font-style:italic}.c17{font-size:12pt}.c14{background-color:#ffffff}.c0{direction:ltr}.c15{font-size:14pt}.c13{font-family:Georgia}.c4{text-decoration:underline}.c19{font-size:10pt}.c5{height:11pt}body{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial}h1{padding-top:24pt;color:#000000;font-size:24pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt} --></h2>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">Warner Bros. Settles &#8216;Hangover II&#8217; Tattoo Lawsuit </a></span></h2>
<p><span>Whitmill v. Warner Bros.</span><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377</a></span></p>
<p><span>.</span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">Second Circuit Finds &#8220;Hot News&#8221; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act</a></span></h2>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>In </span><span>Barclay&#8217;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com</span><span>, </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">Link to decision</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">.</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Copyright Litigation Blog: </span><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">Rebecca Black&#8217;s &#8216;Friday&#8217; Taken Off YouTube</a></span></h2>
<p><span> Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893</a></span></p>
<p><span>TMZ: </span><span><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law </a></span></h2>
<p><span> Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology:</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>California video game law: </span><span><a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html">http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html</a></span></p>
<p><span>Supreme Court decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf</a></span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">Is the idea to use a hair dryer as a weapon copyrightable? No, says Second Circuit.</a></span></h2>
<p><span>Cabell v. Sony Pictures </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures">http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures"> </a></span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Shock Jocks&#8217; Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Murphy v. Millenium Radio Group</span><span>, LLC.</span></p>
<p><span> Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf">http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span>Law360: </span><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">Songwriter Wins Round in Legal Battle with Summit Over &#8216;Twilight&#8217; Song</a></span></h1>
<p><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">Bridal shop loses trademark rights for naked licensing</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enter., Inc</span><span>., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011).</span></p>
<p><span>Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span> See also: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>See also, </span><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3467365781852035897">FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network</a></span><span>, __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 4749044, No. 08-16382 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2010).  Abandonment of trademark by naked license.</span></p>
<p><span> RCFP: </span><span><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931</a></span></p>
<p><span> <a href="http://www.legal-project.org/149/anti-slapp-statutes-in-the-us-by-state">List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State </a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/ed8ab_RrjfbJQUyMI" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/episode-22-%e2%80%93-violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violent Games, (anti) Slapps and other painless fun</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Hangover Tattoo case settled Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot California Video Game Law unconstitutional You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either. Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hangover Tattoo case settled</li>
<li>Hot News Claim &#8211; not so hot</li>
<li>California Video Game Law unconstitutional</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t mess with the Zohan.. In court, either.</li>
<li>Photo Credit removal is DMCA breach</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes<!-- ol{margin:0;padding:0}p{margin:0}.c9{width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c6{color:#000099;font-size:14pt;font-weight:bold}.c2{font-size:14pt;font-family:Georgia}.c7{color:#333333;font-family:Trebuchet MS}.c1{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c3{color:#454545;font-family:Georgia}.c16{background-color:#ea9999}.c8{text-align:center}.c18{color:#454545}.c10{color:#000099}.c12{font-weight:bold}.c11{font-style:italic}.c17{font-size:12pt}.c14{background-color:#ffffff}.c0{direction:ltr}.c15{font-size:14pt}.c13{font-family:Georgia}.c4{text-decoration:underline}.c19{font-size:10pt}.c5{height:11pt}body{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial}h1{padding-top:24pt;color:#000000;font-size:24pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;color:#000000;font-size:12pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;color:#000000;font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt} --></h2>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">Warner Bros. Settles &#8216;Hangover II&#8217; Tattoo Lawsuit </a></span></h2>
<p><span>Whitmill v. Warner Bros.</span><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/warner-bros-settles-hangover-ii-203377</a></span></p>
<p><span>.</span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">Second Circuit Finds &#8220;Hot News&#8221; Misappropriation Claim Preempted By Copyright Act</a></span></h2>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>In </span><span>Barclay&#8217;s Capital Inc. v. TheFlyontheWall.com</span><span>, </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">Link to decision</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58372515/Barclays-v-wall-10-1372-both">.</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Copyright Litigation Blog: </span><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/06/reaping-and-sowing-copyrights-second.html</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">Rebecca Black&#8217;s &#8216;Friday&#8217; Taken Off YouTube</a></span></h2>
<p><span> Rebecca Black adv. Ark Music</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rebecca-blacks-friday-taken-youtube-202893</a></span></p>
<p><span>TMZ: </span><span><a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/">http://www.tmz.com/2011/06/16/rebecca-black-friday-song-youtube-copyright-music-video-official/</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h2><span> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">Supreme Court Strikes Down California Video Game Law </a></span></h2>
<p><span> Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association,</span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/supreme-court-strikes-down-california-205827</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology:</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7a61f80f-27f1-4b7f-a2ac-75241356876f&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-07-04&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>California video game law: </span><span><a href="http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html">http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_1151-1200/ab_1179_bill_20051007_chaptered.html</a></span></p>
<p><span>Supreme Court decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/08-1448.pdf</a></span></p>
<h2><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">Is the idea to use a hair dryer as a weapon copyrightable? No, says Second Circuit.</a></span></h2>
<p><span>Cabell v. Sony Pictures </span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures">http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures</a></span><span><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/58902438/Cabell-v-SONY-Pictures"> </a></span></p>
<p><span> THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-backs-adam-sandler-205956</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Shock Jocks&#8217; Photo Credit Edit Breached DMCA: 3rd Circ</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Murphy v. Millenium Radio Group</span><span>, LLC.</span></p>
<p><span> Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf">http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/102163p.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span>Law360: </span><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/251395?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip</a></span></p>
<p><span>Lexology: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9ebcb548-f480-458a-93cb-fd2340d07e18</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">Songwriter Wins Round in Legal Battle with Summit Over &#8216;Twilight&#8217; Song</a></span></h1>
<p><span>THREsq: </span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/songwriter-wins-round-legal-battle-200813</a></span></p>
<p><span><br />
</span></p>
<h1><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">Bridal shop loses trademark rights for naked licensing</a></span></h1>
<p><span>Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. Halanick Enter., Inc</span><span>., Case No. 10-2863 (7th Cir., May 10, 2011).</span></p>
<p><span>Link to decision: </span><span><a href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/uploads/file/Eva.pdf</a></span></p>
<p><span> See also: </span><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=024256a9-c6b5-4a34-a12a-72a4d5e80aa3&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-06-13&amp;utm_term=</a></span></p>
<p><span>See also, </span><span><a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3467365781852035897">FreecycleSunnyvale v. The Freecycle Network</a></span><span>, __ F.3d. __, 2010 WL 4749044, No. 08-16382 (9th Cir. Nov. 24, 2010).  Abandonment of trademark by naked license.</span></p>
<p><span> RCFP: </span><span><a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931">http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=11931</a></span></p>
<p><span> <a href="http://www.legal-project.org/149/anti-slapp-statutes-in-the-us-by-state">List of Anti Slapp Statutes by State </a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=RrjfbJQUyMI:uxoONHi0AzE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/0c1b4_RrjfbJQUyMI" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/07/violent-games-anti-slapps-and-other-painless-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/196/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/196/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/196/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=wUFT9Gr0_XQ:6b7k73i48VQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/95e76_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=wUFT9Gr0_XQ:6b7k73i48VQ:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/95e76_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=wUFT9Gr0_XQ:6b7k73i48VQ:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=wUFT9Gr0_XQ:6b7k73i48VQ:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c87e_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9c87e_wUFT9Gr0_XQ" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/196/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 21 &#8211; Tough Cookies and Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers Tennessee Neftlix Law Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants Disney and Dish Network duke it out One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies Point Break Parody lawsuit &#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand? and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>

<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers</li>
<li>Tennessee Neftlix Law</li>
<li>Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants</li>
<li>Disney and Dish Network duke it out</li>
<li>One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies</li>
<li>Point Break Parody lawsuit</li>
<li>&#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-192"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Follow Ups</h3>
<h4><a href="http://zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-problems-of-not-clearing-copyright-issues-before-filming-starts/">Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p&#8230;</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Link to Opinion: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/">District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739">Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York<br />
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Also reported at :  <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hayden-christensens-lawsuit-usa-tossed-187290">Hayden Christensen&#8217;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.law360.com/articles/245836">HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-harley-189775">BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO">Link to the Brando boots on Amazon.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO"> </a> (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”&#8230; but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon&#8230; it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name&#8230;.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-749 aligncenter" title="Amazon.com_ brando boot_ Shoes-1" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Amazon.com_-brando-boot_-Shoes-1-300x175.png" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Legislation and Regulatory</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.musicrow.com/2011/06/tennessee-signs-law-prohibiting-netflix-password-sharing/">Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime &#8211; Legislation &amp; Policymaking &#8211; FindLaw Blotter</a></h4>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">Copyright Office Rules on Termination &#8220;Gap Grants.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf">http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">www.copyright.gov</a></p>
<h3 style="text-align: center;">Rulings  &amp; Opinions</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695">Judge Denies Disney&#8217;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-team-6-trademark.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">Disney Surrenders to Navy on &#8216;SEAL Team 6&#8242; Trademark &#8211; Celebrity Intellectual Property &#8211; Celebrity Justice blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-te&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application/">http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704">NY Bakery Owner Sues Scripps Network Over Food Network Show &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704 </a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657">Who Has the Right to Parody Keanu Reeves&#8217; Work In &#8216;Point Break&#8217;? &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The case is Keeling v. New Rock Theatre Productions  Opinion is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/18/Point%20Break%20Live!.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/movie-rights-30-year-old-188604">Movie Rights To 30-Year-Old Book at Center of Lawsuit .</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-just-ask-john-elway.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TrademarkLawyerAttorneyLawFirmRegistrationInfringement+%28Trademark+Law+Practice+Alerts%29">Personal Names can be Protected as Trademarks: Just Ask John Elway tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-&#8230;</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Read more: <a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J">http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6debc5d9-098d-4a9a-a918-24ab056b3803&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-19&amp;utm_term=">Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested</a></h4>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Read more: <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD">http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">&nbsp;</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/20/nothing-like-a-brando-harley-davidson-sued-over-name-of-new-line-of-boots/">Nothing Like a Brando: Harley-Davidson Sued Over Name of New Line of Boots</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-laced-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Laced Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-cast-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Cast Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-gains-big-after-ubs-report-2011-06-06?siteid=rss&amp;rss=1">Harley-Davidson gains big after UBS report</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-motorcycle-boots/">Shoe Cravings: Motorcycle Boots</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.onlineshoes.com/blog/outdoor/going-wild-how-to-find-the-right-motorcycle-boots">Going Wild: The Motorcycle Diaries</a> (onlineshoes.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-men%25e2%2580%2599s-boots-for-spring/">Shoe Cravings: Men&#8217;s Boots for Spring</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2011/04/how-to-sell-a-harley-davidson/">How to sell a Harley-Davidson</a> (hellforleathermagazine.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/30/the-harley-davidson-scooter/">The Harley-Davidson Scooter</a> (neatorama.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-receives-short-term-buy-from-ubs-2011-06-06?siteid=rss">Harley Davidson receives short-term buy from UBS</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://stillisstillmoving.com/willienelson/american-icons-willie-nelson-harley-davidson-and-country-music-throwdown/">American Icons: Willie Nelson, Harley Davidson, and Country Music Throwdown</a> (stillisstillmoving.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/17/the-mouse-takes-bin-laden-disney-moves-to-claim-trademark-to-seal-team-six/">The Mouse Takes Bin Laden: Disney Moves To Claim Trademark to &#8220;Seal Team Six&#8221;</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/5873500207/disney-trademark-seal-team-6">Disney abandons plan to trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (shortformblog.tumblr.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/05/26/seal-team-6-disney/">Disney backs away from &#8216;SEAL Team 6′ trademark</a> (insidemovies.ew.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://thedailywh.at/2011/05/25/follow-up-of-the-day-11/">Follow Up of the Day: Disney Withdraws SEAL Team 6 Trademark Applications</a> (thedailywh.at)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://videogum.com/309931/update-disney-withdraws-application-to-trademark-seal-team-6/behind-the-scenes/">UPDATE: Disney Withdraws Application To Trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6″</a> (videogum.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20062914-10391698.html">Disney trademarks &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (cbsnews.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576345752703592770.html">Disney Retreats&#8230;</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2011/05/disney-drops-its-trademark-application.html">&#8220;Disney Drops Its Trademark Application For SEAL Team Six&#8221; and related posts</a> (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=c9436f93-0b96-4c6a-a361-be925a63ea5f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/entertainment-law-update-episode-21-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode021.mp3" length="70605199" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers   Tennessee Neftlix Law   Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants   Disney and Dish Network duke it out   One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:

	Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers
	Tennessee Neftlix Law
	Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants
	Disney and Dish Network duke it out
	One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies
	Point Break Parody lawsuit
	&quot;Heart Attack&quot; as a brand?
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.

 
Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Follow Ups
Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p...
In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_...
Link to Opinion: http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t

District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/
Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739
Also reported at :  Hayden Christensen&#039;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge - Hollywood Reporter

HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement
BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON
Link to the Brando boots on Amazon.

  (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”... but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon... it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name....



 
Legislation and Regulatory
Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime - Legislation &amp; Policymaking - FindLaw Blotter
Copyright Office Rules on Termination &quot;Gap Grants.&quot; 
http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf
www.copyright.gov

Rulings  &amp; Opinions
Judge Denies Disney&#039;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free - Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695
Disney Surrenders to Navy on &#039;SEAL Team 6&#039; Trademark - Celebrity Intellectual Property - Celebrity Justice blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-te...
http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application.

NY Bakery Owner Sues Scripps Network Over Food Network Show - Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704 
Who Has the Right to Parody Keanu Reeves&#039; Work In &#039;Point Break&#039;? - Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657
The case is Keeling v. New Rock Theatre Productions  Opinion is here.

Movie Rights To 30-Year-Old Book at Center of Lawsuit .
Personal Names can be Protected as Trademarks: Just Ask John Elway tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-...
Read more: http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J

Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested
Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD
 

Related articles

	Nothing Like a Brando: Harley-Davidson Sued Over Name of New Line of Boots (jonathanturley.org)
	Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Laced Rear Wheel Figure (athingforcars.com)
	Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Cast Rear Wheel Figure (athingforcars.com)
	Harley-Davidson gains big after UBS report (marketwatch.com)
	Shoe Cravings: Motorcycle Boots (beso.com)
	Going Wild: The Motorcycle Diaries (onlineshoes.com)
	Shoe Cravings: Men&#039;s Boots for Spring (beso.com)
</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 21 – Tough Cookies and Heart Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers Tennessee Neftlix Law Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants Disney and Dish Network duke it out One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies Point Break Parody lawsuit &#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand? and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/91228_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bogart and Brando vs. Product Manufacturers</li>
<li>Tennessee Neftlix Law</li>
<li>Copyright Office rules on Gap Grants</li>
<li>Disney and Dish Network duke it out</li>
<li>One Tough Cookie sues Tough Cookies</li>
<li>Point Break Parody lawsuit</li>
<li>&#8220;Heart Attack&#8221; as a brand?</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/91228_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<h3>Follow Ups</h3>
<h4><a href="http://zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-problems-of-not-clearing-copyright-issues-before-filming-starts/">Copyrights and Wrongs on Tyson tattoo zernerlaw.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-hangover-2-tyson-tattoo-lawsuit-and-the-p&#8230;</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-17&amp;utm_term=">In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name &amp; Likeness Litigation www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=bd157fb1-657b-4ce9-89c2-39dc86f80668&amp;utm_&#8230;</a></h4>
<p>Link to Opinion: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t">http://tinyurl.com/3np2l7t</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/">District Court Judge Puts Righthaven Cases on Hold     feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/3DaWCxr9kcE/</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739">Copyright Preemption: A Royal Pain For Idea Submission Plaintiffs in New York<br />
www.entertainmentlawmatters.com/?p=1739</a></h4>
<p>Also reported at :  <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hayden-christensens-lawsuit-usa-tossed-187290">Hayden Christensen&#8217;s Lawsuit Against USA Tossed Out by Judge &#8211; Hollywood Reporter</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.law360.com/articles/245836">HUMPHREY BOGART Furniture Settlement</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/marlon-brando-estate-sues-harley-189775">BRANDO SUES HARLEY-DAVIDSON</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO">Link to the Brando boots on Amazon.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Harley-Davidson-BRANDO-Mens-Brando-Boot/dp/B002VA4JZO"> </a> (Looks like Harley Davidson has changed the name of the boot to “Smith”&#8230; but when you type “Brando boot” into Amazon&#8230; it still shows up, along with three other boots using that name&#8230;.</p>
<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-749 aligncenter" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/91228_Amazon.com_-brando-boot_-Shoes-1-300x175.png" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h3>Legislation and Regulatory</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.musicrow.com/2011/06/tennessee-signs-law-prohibiting-netflix-password-sharing/">Tennessee Netflix Law: Password Sharing a Crime &#8211; Legislation &amp; Policymaking &#8211; FindLaw Blotter</a></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">Copyright Office Rules on Termination &#8220;Gap Grants.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf">http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr32316.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.copyright.gov/">www.copyright.gov</a></p>
<h3>Rulings  &amp; Opinions</h3>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695">Judge Denies Disney&#8217;s Motion to Stop Dish From Distributing Movies for Free &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/judge-denies-disneys-motion-stop-194695</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-team-6-trademark.html?DCMP=NWL-cons_elegal">Disney Surrenders to Navy on &#8216;SEAL Team 6&#8242; Trademark &#8211; Celebrity Intellectual Property &#8211; Celebrity Justice blogs.findlaw.com/celebrity_justice/2011/05/disney-surrenders-to-navy-on-seal-te&#8230;</a></h4>
<p><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application/">http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/05/26/mickey%E2%80%99s-retreat-disney-withdraws-seal-team-six-patent-application</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704">NY Bakery Owner Sues Scripps Network Over Food Network Show &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/ny-bakery-owner-sues-scripps-194704 </a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657">Who Has the Right to Parody Keanu Reeves&#8217; Work In &#8216;Point Break&#8217;? &#8211; Hollywood Reporter www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/who-has-right-parody-keanu-190657</a></h4>
<p>The case is Keeling v. New Rock Theatre Productions  Opinion is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/05/18/Point%20Break%20Live!.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/movie-rights-30-year-old-188604">Movie Rights To 30-Year-Old Book at Center of Lawsuit .</a></h4>
<h4><a href="http://tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-just-ask-john-elway.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TrademarkLawyerAttorneyLawFirmRegistrationInfringement+%28Trademark+Law+Practice+Alerts%29">Personal Names can be Protected as Trademarks: Just Ask John Elway tcattorney.typepad.com/ip/2011/06/personal-names-can-be-protected-as-trademarks-&#8230;</a></h4>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J">http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2011-05-28/despite-protests-from-john-elway-punk-band-stays-with-name-elway#ixzz1OcA4WI5J</a></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=6debc5d9-098d-4a9a-a918-24ab056b3803&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-05-19&amp;utm_term=">Trademark rights to “heart attack” designation on food menus contested</a></h4>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD">http://www.azcentral.com/community/chandler/articles/2011/06/01/20110601chandler-heart-attack-grill-closes0603.html#ixzz1OSsdfSyD</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h6>Related articles</h6>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/20/nothing-like-a-brando-harley-davidson-sued-over-name-of-new-line-of-boots/">Nothing Like a Brando: Harley-Davidson Sued Over Name of New Line of Boots</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-laced-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Laced Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://athingforcars.com/autos/harley-davidson-ironhead-1979-to-1983-cast-rear-wheel-figure/">Harley Davidson Ironhead 1979 to 1983 Cast Rear Wheel Figure</a> (athingforcars.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-gains-big-after-ubs-report-2011-06-06?siteid=rss&amp;rss=1">Harley-Davidson gains big after UBS report</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-motorcycle-boots/">Shoe Cravings: Motorcycle Boots</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.onlineshoes.com/blog/outdoor/going-wild-how-to-find-the-right-motorcycle-boots">Going Wild: The Motorcycle Diaries</a> (onlineshoes.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.beso.com/blog/shoe-cravings-men%25e2%2580%2599s-boots-for-spring/">Shoe Cravings: Men&#8217;s Boots for Spring</a> (beso.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://hellforleathermagazine.com/2011/04/how-to-sell-a-harley-davidson/">How to sell a Harley-Davidson</a> (hellforleathermagazine.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/04/30/the-harley-davidson-scooter/">The Harley-Davidson Scooter</a> (neatorama.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/harley-davidson-receives-short-term-buy-from-ubs-2011-06-06?siteid=rss">Harley Davidson receives short-term buy from UBS</a> (marketwatch.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://stillisstillmoving.com/willienelson/american-icons-willie-nelson-harley-davidson-and-country-music-throwdown/">American Icons: Willie Nelson, Harley Davidson, and Country Music Throwdown</a> (stillisstillmoving.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/17/the-mouse-takes-bin-laden-disney-moves-to-claim-trademark-to-seal-team-six/">The Mouse Takes Bin Laden: Disney Moves To Claim Trademark to &#8220;Seal Team Six&#8221;</a> (jonathanturley.org)</li>
<li><a href="http://shortformblog.tumblr.com/post/5873500207/disney-trademark-seal-team-6">Disney abandons plan to trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (shortformblog.tumblr.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/05/26/seal-team-6-disney/">Disney backs away from &#8216;SEAL Team 6′ trademark</a> (insidemovies.ew.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://thedailywh.at/2011/05/25/follow-up-of-the-day-11/">Follow Up of the Day: Disney Withdraws SEAL Team 6 Trademark Applications</a> (thedailywh.at)</li>
<li><a href="http://videogum.com/309931/update-disney-withdraws-application-to-trademark-seal-team-6/behind-the-scenes/">UPDATE: Disney Withdraws Application To Trademark &#8220;Seal Team 6″</a> (videogum.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-20062914-10391698.html">Disney trademarks &#8220;Seal Team 6&#8243;</a> (cbsnews.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304066504576345752703592770.html">Disney Retreats&#8230;</a> (online.wsj.com)</li>
<li><a href="http://warnewsupdates.blogspot.com/2011/05/disney-drops-its-trademark-application.html">&#8220;Disney Drops Its Trademark Application For SEAL Team Six&#8221; and related posts</a> (warnewsupdates.blogspot.com)</li>
</ul>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15dfe_zemified_e.png?x-id=c9436f93-0b96-4c6a-a361-be925a63ea5f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=dTq4Zx-jRJ4:KfiW1Rtzqic:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15dfe_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=dTq4Zx-jRJ4:KfiW1Rtzqic:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15dfe_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=dTq4Zx-jRJ4:KfiW1Rtzqic:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=dTq4Zx-jRJ4:KfiW1Rtzqic:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15dfe_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15dfe_dTq4Zx-jRJ4" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/06/episode-21-%e2%80%93-tough-cookies-and-heart-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 20 &#8211; Tattoos and Topiaries&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img style=&#8221;margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;&#8221; title=&#8221;podcast-logo&#8221; src=&#8221;http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png&#8221; alt=&#8221;podcast-logo&#8221; width=&#8221;171&#8243; height=&#8221;171&#8243; /&gt;&lt;p style=&#8221;text-align: center;&#8221;&gt;[powerpress]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h2 style=&#8221;text-align: center;&#8221;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&#8221;color: #339966;&#8221;&gt;Call us with your feedback:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&#8221;color: #339966;&#8221;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&#8221;color: #339966;&#8221;&gt;(310) 243-6231&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p style=&#8221;text-align: left;&#8221;&gt;In this Episode:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt;	&lt;li&gt;follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;Vandals smear Variety&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;No moral rights in landscape design?&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;Tattoo Law&lt;/li&gt;	&lt;li&gt;and more&#8230;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p style=&#8221;text-align: right;&#8221;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&#8221;color: #0000ff;&#8221;&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://cle-podcasts.com/store&#8221;&gt;GET CLE CREDIT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://cle-podcasts.com/store&#8221;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;for this episode.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style=&#8221;text-align: right;&#8221;&gt;&nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;div style=&#8221;text-align: left;&#8221;&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio&#8221;&gt;&lt;img style=&#8221;margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;&#8221; title=&#8221;Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software &#124; SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms&#8221; src=&#8221;http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg&#8221; alt=&#8221;Clio &#8211; Online Practice Management done right.&#8221; width=&#8221;261&#8243; height=&#8221;103&#8243; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.goclio.com&#8221;&gt; www.goclio.com&lt;/a&gt; and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit &lt;a href=&#8221;http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio&#8221;&gt;http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;h2 style=&#8221;text-align: center;&#8221;&gt;&lt;!&#8211;more&#8211;&gt;Show Notes&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p style=&#8221;text-align: center;&#8221;&gt;&lt;span style=&#8221;font-weight: bold;&#8221;&gt;Follow Ups&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/girls-gone-wild-founder-cleared-in-civil-case&#8221;&gt;Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;strong&gt; Righthaven&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/05/copyright-troll-clobbered-judge-finds.html&#8221;&gt;Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TechnicallyLegal/%7E3/f87x8DA9KWI/&#8221;&gt;Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Futurelawyer/%7E3/OtqxJLDygi8/but-your-honor-we-bought-the-right-to-sue.html&#8221;&gt;But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bratz&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/236101?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip&#8221;&gt;Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/PlagiarismToday/%7E3/hjK76Sue_Ks/&#8221;&gt;How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bryant/MGA v. Mattel&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; (Bratz dolls)&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;Bloomberg:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl&#8221;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl&#8221;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;LA Times:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story&#8221;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story&#8221;&gt;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found thatMattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;$88.5 million&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;. An 8-person juryunanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;Mattel did not own the rights to theBratz dolls, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;early models or sketches; and said that &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;MGA did not steal trade secrets.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;ew trial.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/08-56954/08-56954-2011-05-04.html&#8221;&gt;Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Alien vs Predator  infringement &lt;/strong&gt;plaintiff loses on access AND similarity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=&#8221;&gt;Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=&#8221;&gt;Lexology:&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn&#8221;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn&#8221;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;Opinion:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg&#8221;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg&#8221;&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground&#8230; case will move to California&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fvariety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHGqM2u7f7HuWnvUIVTbo74ji6IlA&#8221;&gt;Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute &#8230;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;THREsq:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&#8243;&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&#8243;&gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/04/punk-band-wins-legal-skirmish-lambastes-plaintiff-and-opposing-counsel-in-animated-video.html&#8221;&gt;Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel inAnimated Video&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;Moral Rights in your backyard?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=682ca05d-0a4d-44f1-b5b5-fc004af865ff&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-26&amp;utm_term=&#8221;&gt;Landscaper artist’s &#8220;rights of integrity&#8221; not violated by city trimming his garden&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;claim that his rights of integrity were violated when t&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;he city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Court held that a &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;garden cannot be copyrighted&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; and thus, an &lt;/span&gt;artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed. &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Fake Script infringed by blog?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span&gt;Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml&#8221;&gt;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-upholds-4m-verdict-176984&#8243;&gt;AppealsCourt Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#8216;Flip This House” &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Comic Book Cases &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw&#8221;&gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ&#8221;&gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;In the latest move in Warner Bros. attempt to hold on to its stake in Superman, a federal judge judge has rejected Warner Bros.’ attempt to gain access to secret document that allegedly show an agreement between the estates of Superman co-creators Joel Shuster and Jerry Siegel not to make further copyright deals with the studio. The documents also allegedly contain a formula for how the two estates will share proceeds on Superman once they successfully terminate Warner Bros.’ rights to the lucrative franchise.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Tattoo Law: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Flegalblogwatch.typepad.com%2Flegal_blog_watch%2F2011%2F05%2Ftattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFFkQ3W_lhQ-73eiXkDfz1k6BLFEg&#8221;&gt;TattooLaw: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w&#8221;&gt;Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement &#124; Off the Bench&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w&#8221;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;A tattoo artist named Victor Whitmill is suing the producers of the film Hangover 2 for copyright infringement.The work in question is the tattoo Whitmill created on Mike Tyson’s face&#8230; it’s sort of a Maori Tribal art kind of thing&#8230; and frames Tyson’s left eye.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;Tyson appeared in the first movie&#8230; Hangover&#8230; and in the 2nd movie,  Ed Helms has  a duplicate tattoo on his face. &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;GLEE plot leaks leads networks to consider NDA language for all contracts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fglee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEbIt7YVQczUF8ttoz6UvJDKPxZLg&#8221;&gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/glee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;An Extra on the successful musical series revealed the identity of the Prom King and Queen, and there was an uproar&#8230; Will day-players and stars alike now have to sign NDA&#8217;s?&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Kentucky Fight Song&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;address&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGJpxd09x1OJy4GkR_09kQ343nrfQ&#8221;&gt;Court fight brews over use of University of Kentucky&#8217;s fight song &#124; Latest Local, State News &#124; Kentucky.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/address&gt;&lt;span&gt;Read more: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F26%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html%23ixzz1M50pA7Nb&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHQhLUlp_oKOkfVvW5mdtOEsJhJig&#8221;&gt;http://www.kentucky.com/2011/04/26/1718804/court-fight-brews-over-use-of.html#ixzz1M50pA7Nb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt; &lt;span&gt;Compulsory Licenses:  the subject of debate by Artists&lt;/span&gt;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/THREsquire/%7E3/QqziFEJaZhU/should-covering-songs-be-illegal-183759&#8243;&gt;Should Covering Songs Be Illegal? Dr. Luke, Ke$ha, Adam Lambert Weigh In&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;span&gt;After PRINCE very publicly denounced the provisions of copyright law that make covering songs possible with acompulsory license. (section 115). The  Hollywood Reporter asks others for their opinions.&lt;/span&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;Resource for our listeners &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;(hat-tip to bob Ambrogi)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawsitesblog.com%2F2011%2F04%2Ffree-law-reporter-puts-searchable-opinions-online.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBjZomo49YAw4v3IxXMiSAKYi6kQ&#8221;&gt;‘Free Law Reporter’ Puts Searchable Opinions Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;The searchable index of recent federal &lt;span&gt;and state court opinions was developed by the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.cali.org/&#8221;&gt;Center&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.cali.org/&#8221;&gt;for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; (CALI). &lt;/span&gt; It is  an “electronic case reporter” that makes the opinionsb searchable and also provides them as ebook collections. &lt;span style=&#8221;font-weight: bold;&#8221;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;h2&gt;Thanks&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;div&gt; If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a &lt;strong&gt;review&lt;/strong&gt; in the iTunes store, and&lt;strong&gt; tell your friends&lt;/strong&gt; and colleagues about the show. &nbsp;&lt;h2&gt;DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&#8221;margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;&#8221;&gt;&lt;a title=&#8221;Enhanced by Zemanta&#8221; href=&#8221;http://www.zemanta.com/&#8221;&gt;&lt;img style=&#8221;border: none; float: right;&#8221; src=&#8221;http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f&#8221; alt=&#8221;Enhanced by Zemanta&#8221; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiariesa-hrefhttpwww-entertainmentlawupdate-comwp-contentuploadsimage0-pngaimg-stylemargin-top-0px-margin-botto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiariesa-hrefhttpwww-entertainmentlawupdate-comwp-contentuploadsimage0-pngaimg-stylemargin-top-0px-margin-botto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc. Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims Vandals smear Variety No moral rights in landscape design? Tattoo Law and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.</li>
<li>Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million</li>
<li>Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims</li>
<li>Vandals smear Variety</li>
<li>No moral rights in landscape design?</li>
<li>Tattoo Law</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-185"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Follow Ups</span></p>
<p class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/girls-gone-wild-founder-cleared-in-civil-case">Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case </a></span></p>
<p><strong> Righthaven</strong></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/05/copyright-troll-clobbered-judge-finds.html">Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/TechnicallyLegal/%7E3/f87x8DA9KWI/">Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/Futurelawyer/%7E3/OtqxJLDygi8/but-your-honor-we-bought-the-right-to-sue.html">But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! </a></span></p>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c0">Bratz</span></h4>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/236101?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights</a></span></h4>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/PlagiarismToday/%7E3/hjK76Sue_Ks/">How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You</a></span></h4>
<p><span class="c2 c8">Bryant/MGA v. Mattel</span><span class="c2"> (Bratz dolls)</span></p>
<p><span class="c2">Bloomberg:</span><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl"> </a></span><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl">http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">LA Times:</span><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"> </a></span><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"></a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found that<br />
Mattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company </span><span class="c2 c8">$88.5 million</span><span class="c2">. An 8-person jury<br />
unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that </span><span class="c2 c8">Mattel did not own the rights to the<br />
Bratz dolls, </span><span class="c2">early models or sketches; and said that </span><span class="c2 c8">MGA did not steal trade secrets.</span><span class="c2">ew trial.</span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c0">9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law</span></h4>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c2 c5"><a class="c1" href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/08-56954/08-56954-2011-05-04.html">Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al</a></span></h4>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c0"><strong>Alien vs Predator  infringement </strong>plaintiff loses on access AND similarity</span></p>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.</a></span></h4>
<p><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Lexology:</a></span><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn"> </a></span><span class="c2 c7"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn">http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">Opinion:</span><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"> </a></span><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg">http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"></a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c0">Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground&#8230; case will move to California</span></strong></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fvariety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHGqM2u7f7HuWnvUIVTbo74ji6IlA">Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute &#8230;</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c2">THREsq:</span><span class="c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026"> </a></span><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/04/punk-band-wins-legal-skirmish-lambastes-plaintiff-and-opposing-counsel-in-animated-video.html">Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel in<br />
Animated Video</a></span></p>
<h4 class="c3 c9"><span class="c0"> </span></h4>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c0">Moral Rights in your backyard?</span></h4>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=682ca05d-0a4d-44f1-b5b5-fc004af865ff&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-26&amp;utm_term=">Landscaper artist’s &#8220;rights of integrity&#8221; not violated by city trimming his garden</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span><span class="c2"> TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s </span><span class="c2 c8">claim that his rights of integrity were violated when t</span><span class="c2 c8">he city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park</span><span class="c2">. </span><span class="c0">The Court held that a </span><span class="c0">garden cannot be copyrighted</span><span class="c2"> and thus, an </span>artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed.</p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c0">Fake Script infringed by blog?</span></strong></p>
<p><span class="c2 c8">Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement</span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml"></a></span></p>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c0">A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim</span></h4>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-upholds-4m-verdict-176984">Appeals<br />
Court Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#8216;Flip This House” </a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c0">Comic Book Cases </span></strong></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span>Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee</p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw"></a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.</span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span>Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation</p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c7 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ"></a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">In the latest move in Warner Bros. attempt to hold on to its stake in Superman, a federal judge judge has rejected Warner Bros.’ attempt to gain access to secret document that allegedly show an agreement between the estates of Superman co-creators Joel Shuster and Jerry Siegel not to make further copyright deals with the studio. The documents also allegedly contain a formula for how the two estates will share proceeds on Superman once they successfully terminate Warner Bros.’ rights to the lucrative franchise.</span></p>
<h4 class="c3 c9"><span class="c2"> </span></h4>
<p><strong><span class="c0">Tattoo Law: </span></strong></p>
<p class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Flegalblogwatch.typepad.com%2Flegal_blog_watch%2F2011%2F05%2Ftattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFFkQ3W_lhQ-73eiXkDfz1k6BLFEg">Tattoo<br />
Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a></span></p>
<p class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w"></a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">A tattoo artist named Victor Whitmill is suing the producers of the film Hangover 2 for copyright infringement.<br />
The work in question is the tattoo Whitmill created on Mike Tyson’s face&#8230; it’s sort of a Maori Tribal art kind of thing&#8230; and frames Tyson’s left eye.</span></p>
<p><span class="c0"> </span>Tyson appeared in the first movie&#8230; Hangover&#8230; and in the 2nd movie,  Ed Helms has  a duplicate tattoo on his face.</p>
<p><span class="c0"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c0">GLEE plot leaks leads networks to consider NDA language for all contracts.</span></strong></p>
<p><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fglee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEbIt7YVQczUF8ttoz6UvJDKPxZLg">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/glee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2">An Extra on the successful musical series revealed the identity of the Prom King and Queen, and there was an uproar&#8230; Will day-players and stars alike now have to sign NDA&#8217;s?</span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c0">Kentucky Fight Song</span></strong></p>
<address class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGJpxd09x1OJy4GkR_09kQ343nrfQ">Court fight brews over use of University of Kentucky&#8217;s fight song | Latest Local, State News | Kentucky.com</a></span></address>
<p><span class="c2">Read more: </span><span class="c2 c13"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F26%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html%23ixzz1M50pA7Nb&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHQhLUlp_oKOkfVvW5mdtOEsJhJig">http://www.kentucky.com/2011/04/26/1718804/court-fight-brews-over-use-of.html#ixzz1M50pA7Nb</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c2"> </span></p>
<p><span class="c0">Compulsory Licenses:  the subject of debate by Artists</span></p>
<h4 class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/THREsquire/%7E3/QqziFEJaZhU/should-covering-songs-be-illegal-183759">Should Covering Songs Be Illegal? Dr. Luke, Ke$ha, Adam Lambert Weigh In</a></span></h4>
<p><span class="c2">After PRINCE very publicly denounced the provisions of copyright law that make covering songs possible with a<br />
compulsory license. (section 115). The  Hollywood Reporter asks others for their opinions.</span></p>
<p><strong><span class="c2"> </span></strong><strong><span class="c0">Resource for our listeners </span><span class="c2">(hat-tip to bob Ambrogi)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span class="c2"> </span></strong></p>
<p class="c3"><span class="c5 c2"><a class="c1" href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawsitesblog.com%2F2011%2F04%2Ffree-law-reporter-puts-searchable-opinions-online.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBjZomo49YAw4v3IxXMiSAKYi6kQ">‘Free Law Reporter’ Puts Searchable Opinions Online</a></span></p>
<p><span class="c10"> </span>The searchable index of recent federal <span class="c10">and state court opinions was developed by the </span><span class="c10 c8 c11"><a class="c1" href="http://www.cali.org/">Center</a> </span><span class="c10 c8 c11"><a class="c1" href="http://www.cali.org/">for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction</a></span><span class="c10"> (CALI). </span> It is  an “electronic case reporter” that makes the opinionsb searchable and also provides them as ebook collections. <span style="font-weight: bold;"> </span></p>
<h2>Thanks</h2>
<div>
<p>If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a <strong>review</strong> in the iTunes store, and<strong> tell your friends</strong> and colleagues about the show.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.</h2>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-tattoos-and-topiariesa-hrefhttpwww-entertainmentlawupdate-comwp-contentuploadsimage0-pngaimg-stylemargin-top-0px-margin-botto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode020.mp3" length="97634010" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.   Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million   Copyright doesn&#039;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims   Vandals smear Variety </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.
	Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million
	Copyright doesn&#039;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims
	Vandals smear Variety
	No moral rights in landscape design?
	Tattoo Law
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.
 

Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at www.goclio.com and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&quot; Or, just visit http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio
Show Notes
Follow Ups
Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case 
 Righthaven

Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use

 

Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause

 

But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! 
Bratz
Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights
How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You
Bryant/MGA v. Mattel (Bratz dolls)

Bloomberg: http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl

LA Times: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story



In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found that
Mattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company $88.5 million. An 8-person jury
unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that Mattel did not own the rights to the
Bratz dolls, early models or sketches; and said that MGA did not steal trade secrets.ew trial.

 
9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law
Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al
 

Alien vs Predator  infringement plaintiff loses on access AND similarity
Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
Lexology: http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn

Opinion: http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg



 

Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground... case will move to California

Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute ...

 

THREsq: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026

Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel in
Animated Video
 
Moral Rights in your backyard?
Landscaper artist’s &quot;rights of integrity&quot; not violated by city trimming his garden

  TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s claim that his rights of integrity were violated when the city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park. The Court held that a garden cannot be copyrighted and thus, an artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed.

 

Fake Script infringed by blog?

Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml


A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim
Appeals
Court Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#039;Flip This House” 

 

Comic Book Cases 

 Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918



In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.

 Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832



In the latest move in Warner Bros.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Episode 20 – Tattoos and Topiaries</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 05:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc. Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims Vandals smear Variety No moral rights in landscape design? Tattoo Law and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/84efa_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>follow ups on Righthaven, Girls Gone Wild,etc.</li>
<li>Bratz  verdict of $88.5 Million</li>
<li>Copyright doesn&#8217;t pre-empt contract and confidence claims</li>
<li>Vandals smear Variety</li>
<li>No moral rights in landscape design?</li>
<li>Tattoo Law</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/7665b_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<p><span>Follow Ups</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/girls-gone-wild-founder-cleared-in-civil-case">Girls Gone Wild founder cleared in civil case </a></span></p>
<p><strong> Righthaven</strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/05/copyright-troll-clobbered-judge-finds.html">Copyright Troll Clobbered: Judge Finds Use of Entire News Article Fair Use</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnicallyLegal/~3/f87x8DA9KWI/">Righthaven and the Case or Controversy Clause</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Futurelawyer/~3/OtqxJLDygi8/but-your-honor-we-bought-the-right-to-sue.html">But Your Honor, We Bought The Right To Sue! </a></span></p>
<h4><span>Bratz</span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://www.law360.com/ip/articles/236101?utm_source=newsletter&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=ip">Mattel, MGA Fight Final Brawl Over Bratz Rights</a></span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PlagiarismToday/~3/hjK76Sue_Ks/">How the Bratz Verdict May Impact You</a></span></h4>
<p><span>Bryant/MGA v. Mattel</span><span> (Bratz dolls)</span></p>
<p><span>Bloomberg:</span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl">http://tinyurl.com/3pq47kl</a></span></p>
<p><span>LA Times:</span><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"> </a></span><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-bratz-verdict-20110422,0,6609913.story"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In a retrial over who owns the rights to the billion-dollar Bratz doll franchise, a federal jury found that<br />
Mattel misappropriated trade secrets from MGA and owes the company </span><span>$88.5 million</span><span>. An 8-person jury<br />
unanimously rejected Mattel’s copyright infringement claims and said that </span><span>Mattel did not own the rights to the<br />
Bratz dolls, </span><span>early models or sketches; and said that </span><span>MGA did not steal trade secrets.</span><span>ew trial.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<h4><span>9th Circuit rules contract and breach of confidence claims NOT pre-empted by Copyright law</span></h4>
<h4><span><a href="http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca9/08-56954/08-56954-2011-05-04.html">Larry Montz, et al v. Pilgrim Films &amp; Television, In, et al</a></span></h4>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><strong>Alien vs Predator  infringement </strong>plaintiff loses on access AND similarity</span></p>
<h4><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Muller v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.</a></span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=da1b3f95-c483-4673-9eb9-f70cad6a56ad&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Other+states+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-18&amp;utm_term=">Lexology:</a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn">http://tinyurl.com/44aa6hn</a></span></p>
<p><span>Opinion:</span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"> </a></span><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg">http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3zqfhbg"></a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Variety takes on The Vandals in Delaware and loses ground&#8230; case will move to California</span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fvariety-loses-round-one-punk-179026&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHGqM2u7f7HuWnvUIVTbo74ji6IlA">Variety Loses Round One to Punk Band In Album Cover Dispute &#8230;</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>THREsq:</span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026"> </a></span><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/variety-loses-round-one-punk-179026</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://legalblogwatch.typepad.com/legal_blog_watch/2011/04/punk-band-wins-legal-skirmish-lambastes-plaintiff-and-opposing-counsel-in-animated-video.html">Punk Band Wins Legal Skirmish, Lambastes Plaintiff and Opposing Counsel in<br />
Animated Video</a></span></p>
<h4><span> </span></h4>
<h4><span>Moral Rights in your backyard?</span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=682ca05d-0a4d-44f1-b5b5-fc004af865ff&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-04-26&amp;utm_term=">Landscaper artist’s &#8220;rights of integrity&#8221; not violated by city trimming his garden</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span><span> TheSeventh Circuit recently rejected a landscape artist’s </span><span>claim that his rights of integrity were violated when t</span><span>he city of Chicago altered his artistic garden in Chicago’s Grant Park</span><span>. </span><span>The Court held that a </span><span>garden cannot be copyrighted</span><span> and thus, an </span>artist cannot successfully claim that his “moral rights” are violated if the garden is altered or destroyed.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Fake Script infringed by blog?</span></strong></p>
<p><span>Lionsgate claims that reviewing false script is copyright infringement</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110411/03242213846/lionsgate-claims-that-reviewing-fake-script-is-copyright-infringement.shtml"></a></span></p>
<h4><span>A&amp;E loses appeal of idea theft claim</span></h4>
<p><span><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/appeals-court-upholds-4m-verdict-176984">Appeals<br />
Court Upholds $4M Verdict Against A&amp;E Over &#8216;Flip This House” </a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Comic Book Cases </span></strong></p>
<p><span> </span>Stan Lee Media v. Stan Lee</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/stan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fstan-lee-fights-legal-war-176918&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHMnExjEfMmCdTbpS-uP1FTGU1djw"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In the latest news regarding the long-running legal battle between comic book writer/creator Stan Lee and the company that bears his name, Stan Lee Media Inc., a California federal judge will decide whether a trial is necessary to determine who holds the rights to Marvel characters such as Spiderman, the Incredible Hulk, X-Men, Iron Man, the Fantastic Four, and Thor.</span></p>
<p><span> </span>Warner Bros./DC Comics and Superman litigation</p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/new-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fnew-setback-warner-bros-superman-177832&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFflXMYVHqE2VnCFzKDIUClZt7QmQ"></a></span></p>
<p><span>In the latest move in Warner Bros. attempt to hold on to its stake in Superman, a federal judge judge has rejected Warner Bros.’ attempt to gain access to secret document that allegedly show an agreement between the estates of Superman co-creators Joel Shuster and Jerry Siegel not to make further copyright deals with the studio. The documents also allegedly contain a formula for how the two estates will share proceeds on Superman once they successfully terminate Warner Bros.’ rights to the lucrative franchise.</span></p>
<h4><span> </span></h4>
<p><strong><span>Tattoo Law: </span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Flegalblogwatch.typepad.com%2Flegal_blog_watch%2F2011%2F05%2Ftattoo-law-can-hangover-2-use-tyson-tattoo-on-ed-helms-character.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNFFkQ3W_lhQ-73eiXkDfz1k6BLFEg">Tattoo<br />
Law: Can &#8216;Hangover 2&#8242; Use Tyson Tattoo on Ed Helms&#8217; Character?</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w">Tyson’s tattoo artist sues to stop ‘Hangover 2′ … claims copyright infringement | Off the Bench</a></span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Foffthebench.nbcsports.com%2F2011%2F04%2F29%2Ftysons-tattoo-artist-sues-to-stop-hangover-2-claims-copyright-infringement%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitterfeed%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEVj4ccdaI__e9Zvkaq9XS6jvIx5w"></a></span></p>
<p><span>A tattoo artist named Victor Whitmill is suing the producers of the film Hangover 2 for copyright infringement.<br />
The work in question is the tattoo Whitmill created on Mike Tyson’s face&#8230; it’s sort of a Maori Tribal art kind of thing&#8230; and frames Tyson’s left eye.</span></p>
<p><span> </span>Tyson appeared in the first movie&#8230; Hangover&#8230; and in the 2nd movie,  Ed Helms has  a duplicate tattoo on his face.</p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>GLEE plot leaks leads networks to consider NDA language for all contracts.</span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hollywoodreporter.com%2Fthr-esq%2Fglee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNEbIt7YVQczUF8ttoz6UvJDKPxZLg">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/glee-spoiler-leads-fox-consider-179867</a></span></p>
<p><span>An Extra on the successful musical series revealed the identity of the Prom King and Queen, and there was an uproar&#8230; Will day-players and stars alike now have to sign NDA&#8217;s?</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><strong><span>Kentucky Fight Song</span></strong></p>
<address><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F25%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNGJpxd09x1OJy4GkR_09kQ343nrfQ">Court fight brews over use of University of Kentucky&#8217;s fight song | Latest Local, State News | Kentucky.com</a></span></address>
<p><span>Read more: </span><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kentucky.com%2F2011%2F04%2F26%2F1718804%2Fcourt-fight-brews-over-use-of.html%23ixzz1M50pA7Nb&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHQhLUlp_oKOkfVvW5mdtOEsJhJig">http://www.kentucky.com/2011/04/26/1718804/court-fight-brews-over-use-of.html#ixzz1M50pA7Nb</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Compulsory Licenses:  the subject of debate by Artists</span></p>
<h4><span><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/QqziFEJaZhU/should-covering-songs-be-illegal-183759">Should Covering Songs Be Illegal? Dr. Luke, Ke$ha, Adam Lambert Weigh In</a></span></h4>
<p><span>After PRINCE very publicly denounced the provisions of copyright law that make covering songs possible with a<br />
compulsory license. (section 115). The  Hollywood Reporter asks others for their opinions.</span></p>
<p><strong><span> </span></strong><strong><span>Resource for our listeners </span><span>(hat-tip to bob Ambrogi)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span> </span></strong></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawsitesblog.com%2F2011%2F04%2Ffree-law-reporter-puts-searchable-opinions-online.html&amp;sa=D&amp;sntz=1&amp;usg=AFQjCNHBjZomo49YAw4v3IxXMiSAKYi6kQ">‘Free Law Reporter’ Puts Searchable Opinions Online</a></span></p>
<p><span> </span>The searchable index of recent federal <span>and state court opinions was developed by the </span><span><a href="http://www.cali.org/">Center</a> </span><span><a href="http://www.cali.org/">for Computer-Assisted Legal Instruction</a></span><span> (CALI). </span> It is  an “electronic case reporter” that makes the opinionsb searchable and also provides them as ebook collections. <span> </span></p>
<h2>Thanks</h2>
<div>
<p>If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a <strong>review</strong> in the iTunes store, and<strong> tell your friends</strong> and colleagues about the show.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.</h2>
</div>
<div><a title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none;float: right" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/7665b_zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
<div>
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=ucf6HldQBvs:tRaLecg1CEY:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/7665b_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=ucf6HldQBvs:tRaLecg1CEY:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/7665b_EntertainmentLawUpdate?i=ucf6HldQBvs:tRaLecg1CEY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"/></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/EntertainmentLawUpdate?a=ucf6HldQBvs:tRaLecg1CEY:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/edb0e_EntertainmentLawUpdate?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"/></a>
</div>
<p><img src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/edb0e_ucf6HldQBvs" height="1" width="1" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/05/entertainment-law-update-episode-20-%e2%80%93-tattoos-and-topiaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entertainment Law Update Podcast &#8211; episode 019 &#8211; Boop Boop Be Doo!</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Penguin Group Golan v. Holder Documentary/Reality and privacy rights Cariou v. Prince Betty Boop and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 135px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 50px;" title="podcast-logo" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><strong><span style="color: #339966;">Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span style="color: #339966;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="color: #339966;">(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p style="text-align: left;">In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow Ups</li>
<li>Penguin Group</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder</li>
<li>Documentary/Reality and privacy rights</li>
<li>Cariou v. Prince</li>
<li>Betty Boop</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: right;"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">&nbsp;</p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px; margin-bottom: 45px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Clio_ Online Legal Practice Management Software | SaaS for Lawyers, Attorneys, Law Firms" src="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2 style="text-align: center;"><span id="more-180"></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>Follow Ups</div>
<div><strong>Mass-Suing of Pirates Gets Shot In Arm Thanks to DC Judge</strong><br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/%7Er/THREsquire/%7E3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403</a></div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Posting of Entire News Article is Fair Use, Says Judge in Righthaven</strong> Copyright Litigation :</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2011/03/articles/copyright/posting-of-entire-news-article-is-fair-use-says-judge-in-righthaven-copyright-litigation/">New Media and Technology Law Blog </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/">http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Supreme Court denies Eminem royalties hearing</strong><br />
Detroit Free Press: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9">http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9</a></p>
<p>In the wake of the FBT case&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Rick James Estate Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Universal Music Over Digital Revenue </strong><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323</a></p>
<p><strong>WGA, AMPTP agree on new contract</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164">http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164</a><br />
Jonathan Handel’s article: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325</a></p>
<p><strong>Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece </a></p>
<p>Opinion:  <a href="http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf">http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Supreme Court</p>
<p><strong>Golan v. Holder </strong>(questioning constitutionality of recapture of copyrights in foreign PD works)<br />
<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2011/03/supreme-court-to-hear-challenge-to-copyright-term-extension-act-with-regard-to-foreign-works-golan-v.html">Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Copyright Term Extension Act With Regard To Foreign Works (Golan v. Holder)</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm">Copyright Take-Backs? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Golan v. Holder</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/us/22bar.html?_r=2&amp;hp">Restoring Copyright to Public Domain Works &#8211; Adam Liptak &#8211; NYTimes.com</a><br />
Lexology:<a href="http://miniurl.org/7Mk"> http://miniurl.org/7Mk</a>,<a href="http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf"> http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
SUMMARY:<br />
The big question: Is Congress free to restore copyright protection to works that had entered the public domain and become public property?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">QUICK TAKE</p>
<p><strong>Obama Administration &#8211; tough new laws for IP proposed</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hollywood-docket-obama-administration-proposes-168427">Hollywood Docket: Obama Administration Proposes Tough New IP Laws </a><br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming.ars">Obama &#8220;IP czar&#8221; wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming</a></p>
<p>The White House IP Enforcement Coordinator, Victoria Espinel, has published 20 legislative recommendations to Congress. Some of the relevant recommendations include:</p>
<p>1. Making infringement by streaming, or by means of other similar new technology, a felony. Currently, “reproducing” and “distributing” copyrighted works are felony charges but streaming, which seems more like a “public performance” is not a felony. This legislative change would impose felony charges on streaming pirated works.</p>
<p>2. Giving wiretap authority to the FBI and other federal agencies for intellectual property crimes, particularly criminal copyright and trademark cases.</p>
<p>3. Creating a public performance right for sound recordings transmitted by over-the-air broadcast stations. Currently, radio stations pay songwriters for the music they play but don’t have to pay the bands who recorded the material.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Rights of privacy and publicity</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignright" title="Up in Smoke" src="http://notaurious.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/up-in-smoke-tour.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="154" /><strong>Mich. high court sides with Dr. Dre in spat over concert footage</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=24008">http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=24008</a><br />
Bowens v. Ary, Inc.  Mi. Supreme Court</p>
<p>SC: 140296 COA: 282711 Wayne CC: 02-233251-CZ<br />
No expectation of privacy when public official is executing the duties of his office.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Reality Show did not violate right of publicity of arrestee.</strong><br />
Best v. Berard  <a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e28f0e79-6c37-4d0d-b9ce-d3d908b5586a">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e28f0e79-6c37-4d0d-b9ce-d3d908b5586a</a><br />
Decision: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/475bbbb">http://tinyurl.com/475bbbb</a></p>
<p>A state agency&#8217;s decision to award $1500 each to 23 black moviegoers at &#8220;Tyler Perry&#8217;s Why Did I Get Married?&#8221; is reversed.<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303</a><br />
Copyright and other cases<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-hushing-black-theatergoers-163303"></a><br />
<strong>Cariou v. Prince (Art Litigation)</strong><img class="alignright" title="Cariou v. Prince" src="http://images.artnet.com/images_US/magazine/news/garnett/cariou-prince.jpg" alt="" width="229" height="159" /><br />
<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince">http://www.scribd.com/doc/51214313/Cariou-v-Richard-Prince</a><br />
<a href="http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html">http://nysbar.com/blogs/EASL/2011/03/fair_use_decision.html</a><br />
<a href="http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html">http://copyrightlitigation.blogspot.com/2011/03/art-litigation-artist-richard-prince.html</a></p>
<p>In this case, photographer Patrick Cariou claimed that “appropriation” artist Richard Prince infringed Cariou’s copyrighted photographs of Rastafarians in a series of collages and paintings created by Prince and sold by his art dealer (and co-defendant) the Gagosian Gallery.  Court finds AGAINST fair use.</p>
<p><strong>Betty Boop (*Fleischer  v. A.V.E.L.A.)</strong><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term="><strong><img class="alignright" title="Boop" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Betty-boop-opening-title.jpg" alt="" width="168" height="129" /></strong></a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Fleischer Studios v. A.V.E.L.A. (Betty Boop case) (A.V.E.L.A = Art &amp; Vintage En<strong> </strong>tertainment Licensing Agency)</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a02226e5-47c4-410c-8917-dec8b619eea8&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=">Lexology:</a><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2"> http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2</a><strong> </strong><br />
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6hy9af2"></a><br />
SUMMARY:<br />
Fleischer studios (merchandise licensor of Boop for use in toys, dolls, etc.) brought action against A.V.E.L.A. (competitor, licenses and uses Boop image on dolls, t-shirts and handbags) alleging copyright and TM infringement in the “Betty Boop” character.  A.V.E.L.A. moved for summary judgment (granted). Fleischer appealed district court’s ruling that Fleischer held neither a valid copyright nor a valid TM in the Betty Boop character. Ninth Circuit affirmed.<br />
Can Warner Bros. Stop Others From Using &#8216;Wizard of Oz&#8217; Characters?<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/can-warner-bros-stop-others-162446"></a></p>
<p><strong>Bath &amp; Body Works v. Summit</strong> &#8211; dispute over “Twilight” line of toiletries<br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/bath-body-works-sues-summit-166019"></a></p>
<p>No Doubt you can sue!<br />
<strong>No Doubt v. Activision</strong> (No Doubt sues over use of likeness in Band Hero)<br />
Lexology:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp"> http://tinyurl.com/6afzxzp</a><br />
Westlaw:<a href="http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8"> http://tinyurl.com/6yrkbj8</a></p>
<h4>Levi Strauss &amp; Co. v. Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Trading Co.</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=be1f96e9-1123-426f-a180-7d3c818c539e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term=%20">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=be1f96e9-1123-426f-a180-7d3c818c539e&amp;utm_source=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed&amp;utm_medium=HTML+email+-+Body+-+Federal+section&amp;utm_campaign=Lexology+subscriber+daily+feed&amp;utm_content=Lexology+Daily+Newsfeed+2011-03-14&amp;utm_term= </a></p>
<p>This case involves trademark ownership of the stitch design on the back pocket of blue jeans. Specifically, Levi believes that the stitch used on the back pocket for Abercrombie &amp;Fitch blue jeans is too close in design to the stitch used on Levi’s blue jeans.</p>
<p><strong>Limewire damages</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=2157">http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=2157</a><br />
Damages order: <a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/limewiredamagesorder.pdf">http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/limewiredamagesorder.pdf</a></p>
<p>If you like what we do here each time, please do us two favors.  Give us a review in the iTunes store, and tell your friends and colleagues about the show.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2>DON&#8217;T FORGET  YOUR CLE CREDIT.</h2>
</div>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-handel/wga-ballots-on-the-way_b_845146.html">Jonathan Handel: WGA Ballots on the Way</a> (huffingtonpost.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/2011/03/golan-holder-google-books.html">Will Golan v. Holder affect the Google Books settlement?</a> (radar.oreilly.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2011/04/01/copyright-2-0-show-episode-189/">Copyright 2.0 Show &#8211; Episode 189</a> (plagiarismtoday.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm">Copyright Take-Backs? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Golan v. Holder</a> (ericgoldman.org)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=bfe7383b-7251-4502-aca5-166c4e6c6e9f" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/entertainment-law-update-podcast-episode-019-boop-boop-be-doo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://traffic.libsyn.com/entertainmentlawupdate/EntertainmentLawUpdateEpisode019.mp3" length="92682137" type="audio/mpeg" />
			<itunes:subtitle>Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode:   Follow Ups   Penguin Group   Golan v. Holder   Documentary/Reality and privacy rights   Cariou v. Prince   Betty Boop   and more... - GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.   - </itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Call us with your feedback:
(310) 243-6231
In this Episode:


	Follow Ups
	Penguin Group
	Golan v. Holder
	Documentary/Reality and privacy rights
	Cariou v. Prince
	Betty Boop
	and more...

GET CLE CREDIT for this episode.
 

Entertainm...</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author>CLE-podcasts.com</itunes:author>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:duration>1:09:02</itunes:duration>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Episode 019 – Boop Boop Be Doo!</title>
		<link>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law Update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cle-podcasts.com/2011/04/episode-019-%e2%80%93-boop-boop-be-doo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call us with your feedback: (310) 243-6231 In this Episode: Follow Ups Penguin Group Golan v. Holder Documentary/Reality and privacy rights Cariou v. Prince Betty Boop and more&#8230; GET CLE CREDIT for this episode. &#160; Entertainment Law Update is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.entertainmentlawupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/image0.png"></a><br />
<img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-7 alignleft" style="margin-top: 0px;margin-bottom: 135px;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 50px" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/26a30_podcast-logo.png" alt="podcast-logo" width="171" height="171" /></p>
</p>
<h2><strong><span>Call us with your feedback:</span></strong><span><br />
</span><strong><span>(310) 243-6231</span></strong></h2>
<p>In this Episode:</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow Ups</li>
<li>Penguin Group</li>
<li>Golan v. Holder</li>
<li>Documentary/Reality and privacy rights</li>
<li>Cariou v. Prince</li>
<li>Betty Boop</li>
<li>and more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store">GET CLE CREDIT</a></span></strong><em><a href="http://cle-podcasts.com/store"> </a></em>for this episode.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio"><img class="size-full wp-image-676 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px;margin-right: 5px;margin-bottom: 45px;border: 2px solid black" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/26a30_Clio_-Online-Legal-Practice-Management-Software-SaaS-for-Lawyers-Attorneys-Law-Firms.jpg" alt="Clio - Online Practice Management done right." width="261" height="103" /></a>Entertainment Law Update  is brought to you by Clio, the best way to manage your practice online. Clio allows you to manage your matters, clients, time, bills, trust accounts and more all through a a secure, easy-to-use, web-based interface. For a free 30-day trial and 25% off your first 6 months of Clio, sign up at<a href="http://www.goclio.com"> www.goclio.com</a> and enter promotional code [ENTLAW]&#8221; Or, just visit <a href="http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio">http://entertainmentlawupdate.com/clio</a></div>
<h2><span></span>Show Notes</h2>
<div>Follow Ups</div>
<div><strong>Mass-Suing of Pirates Gets Shot In Arm Thanks to DC Judge</strong><br />
<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403">http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/THREsquire/~3/lHlTk3GPBQg/mass-suing-pirates-gets-shot-170403</a></div>
<div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Posting of Entire News Article is Fair Use, Says Judge in Righthaven</strong> Copyright Litigation :</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://newmedialaw.proskauer.com/2011/03/articles/copyright/posting-of-entire-news-article-is-fair-use-says-judge-in-righthaven-copyright-litigation/">New Media and Technology Law Blog </a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/">http://www.righthavenlawsuits.com/</a></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Supreme Court denies Eminem royalties hearing</strong><br />
Detroit Free Press: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9">http://tinyurl.com/67xgoe9</a></p>
<p>In the wake of the FBT case&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Rick James Estate Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Universal Music Over Digital Revenue </strong><a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323">http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/rick-james-estate-files-class-174323</a></p>
<p><strong>WGA, AMPTP agree on new contract</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164">http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118034164</a><br />
Jonathan Handel’s article: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325">http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/25/industry-us-wga-idUSTRE72O76320110325</a></p>
<p><strong>Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece">http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=83de5f50-6c55-4747-9758-e4b63774cece </a></p>
<p>Opinion:  <a href="http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf">http://www.ipinbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/district-court-opinion1.pdf</a></p>
<p>Supreme Court</p>
<p><strong>Golan v. Holder </strong>(questioning constitutionality of recapture of copyrights in foreign PD works)<br />
<a href="http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/2011/03/supreme-court-to-hear-challenge-to-copyright-term-extension-act-with-regard-to-foreign-works-golan-v.html">Supreme Court To Hear Challenge To Copyright Term Extension Act With Regard To Foreign Works (Golan v. Holder)</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm">Copyright Take-Backs? Supreme Court Grants Cert in Golan v. Holder</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/21/us/22bar.html?_r=2&amp;hp">Restoring Copyright to Public Domain Works &#8211; Adam Liptak &#8211; NYTimes.com</a><br />
Lexology:<a href="http://miniurl.org/7Mk"> http://miniurl.org/7Mk</a>,<a href="http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf"> http://tinyurl.com/49tzkdf</a><a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
<a href="http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/03/copyright_takeb.htm"></a><br />
SUMMARY:<br />
The big question: Is Congress free to restore copyright protection to works that had entered the public domain and become public property?</p>
<p>QUICK TAKE</p>
<p><strong>Obama Administration &#8211; tough new laws for IP proposed</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/hollywood-docket-obama-administration-proposes-168427">Hollywood Docket: Obama Administration Proposes Tough New IP Laws </a><br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/03/obama-ip-czar-wants-felony-charges-for-illegal-web-streaming.ars">Obama &#8220;IP czar&#8221; wants felony charges for illegal Web streaming</a></p>
<p>The White House IP Enforcement Coordinator, Victoria Espinel, has published 20 legislative recommendations to Congress. Some of the relevant recommendations include:</p>
<p>1. Making infringement by streaming, or by means of other similar new technology, a felony. Currently, “reproducing” and “distributing” copyrighted works are felony charges but streaming, which seems more like a “public performance” is not a felony. This legislative change would impose felony charges on streaming pirated works.</p>
<p>2. Giving wiretap authority to the FBI and other federal agencies for intellectual property crimes, particularly criminal copyright and trademark cases.</p>
<p>3. Creating a public performance right for sound recordings transmitted by over-the-air broadcast stations. Currently, radio stations pay songwriters for the music they play but don’t have to pay the bands who recorded the material.</p>
<p><strong>Rights of privacy and publicity</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://www.cle-podcasts.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/f31bf_up-in-smoke-tour.jpg" alt="" width="157" height="154" /><strong>Mich. high court sides with Dr. Dre in spat over concert footage</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=24008">http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org
